UXXRAY · facts, not opinions Browse x-rays →
Above-the-fold capture of clerk.com
their above-the-fold, as captured

UXXRAY · Teardown dossier

clerk.com

clerk-com-2026-07-10-desktop

saas · desktop · 2026-07-10

85 /100

Strong ★★★★☆ brand avg across funnels desktop 85 · mobile 85 → avg

Score breakdown

  • Offer clarity 8/8
  • Action path 11/20
  • Trust & proof 11/11
  • Friction reduction 10/10
  • Value reinforcement 10/10

The funnel, frame by frame

see their whole funnel without clicking through it — scored step by stepmeasured
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

4 tactics

$50 +5 more  ·  subscription

Free trialLogo wallPricing tiersDemo / docs
Pricing
02

Pricing

▲ strongest
11 tactics

$0.02 +20 more  ·  subscription  ·  1 proof point

Sticky CTAComparisonSubscriptionFAQTrust badgesFree trialNo cardLogo wallUsage proofPricing tiersDemo / docs
Startups
03

Startups

▼ thinnest
1 tactic

$5 +2 more

Demo / docs

Offer

how clearly they present the deal and its valuemeasured
8/8highpoints earned
  • Pricing tiersfree, $9/mo, $19/mofree, $20/mo, $0.02/mo, $75/mo

Action

the path to convert — CTA, sign-up, checkoutmeasured
11/20partialpoints earned
  • Free trial / freemiumfree trialfree tier
  • Demo / docs entry

Not detected: proof above the fold and lead-capture form.

Trust

proof, social proof, and credibilitymeasured
11/11highpoints earned
  • Trusted-by logo walltrusted by
  • Usage / adoption proof10,000 members

Friction

objections answered, barriers removedmeasured
10/10highpoints earned
  • FAQ / objection handlingIs Clerk cheaper than Auth0?
  • Free trial / freemiumfree trialfree tier

Value

why it’s worth it — comparison and reinforcementmeasured
10/10highpoints earned
  • Us-vs-them comparisoncomparison grid: 51 rows
  • Usage / adoption proof10,000 members

Brand kit

palette by on-page usage · type rendered livemeasured
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#212126
accent#212126
bg#f7f7f8
surface#ffffff
text#131316
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox64px
Jumps over the lazy dog32px
A subheading in their voice18px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor — same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three

Teardown report — copy for your LLM

the full evidence-based read: what this funnel does well, where it is thin, and the on-page proof for each — paste into any agent to learn from
clerk.com · 7/9 tactics · 1 proof templates · evidence-backed
# Funnel Teardown — clerk.com

> An evidence-based read of clerk.com's live conversion funnel, captured 2026-07-10.
> Every claim is measured from the page; each detected tactic carries the exact
> on-page string it fired on. Deterministic extraction — no LLM opinion. Read this
> to understand WHY this funnel converts (or leaks) — the persuasion principles it
> uses and the ones it's missing. It is a report to learn from, not a template to clone.

**Funnel type:** saas
**Evidence Coverage Score:** 85/100 (Strong)
**Path captured:** Homepage / Lander → Pricing → Startups

## Scorecard — where the points come from
| Category | Earned |
|----------|-------:|
| Offer clarity | 8 / 8 |
| Action path | 11 / 20 |
| Trust & proof | 11 / 11 |
| Friction reduction | 10 / 10 |
| Value reinforcement | 10 / 10 |
| Risk reversal & urgency | 0 / 0 |

## What's working — tactics in play, with proof
Each is a persuasion mechanism the funnel actually deploys; the quoted string is the on-page evidence.
- **Us-vs-them comparison** — A comparison table framing the brand against alternatives.  
  _Proof:_ `p2: comparison grid: 51 rows`
- **FAQ / objection handling** — An accordion / FAQ block answering objections.  
  _Proof:_ `p2: Is Clerk cheaper than Auth0?`
- **Free trial / freemium** — A free trial, free tier, or "no credit card" entry offer.  
  _Proof:_ `home: free trial`, `p2: free tier`
- **Trusted-by logo wall** — Customer/company logos or a "trusted by / used by" claim.  
  _Proof:_ `home: backed by`, `p2: trusted by`
- **Usage / adoption proof** — A count of developers / teams / companies / stars using the product.  
  _Proof:_ `p2: 10,000 members`
- **Pricing tiers** — Named plan tiers with per-month / per-seat pricing.  
  _Proof:_ `home: free, $9/mo, $19/mo`, `p2: free, $20/mo, $0.02/mo, $75/mo`
- **Demo / docs entry** — A "book a demo" or documentation / API entry point.  
  _Proof:_ `home: Documentation`, `p2: Documentation`, `p3: Documentation`

## What's missing — gaps for a saas funnel
Conversion tactics that apply to this funnel type but weren't found — the openings a competitor could exploit:
- **Proof above the fold** — not detected. Social proof rendered within the first viewport on at least one step.
- **Lead-capture form** — not detected. An on-page form collecting contact details (email / name / phone) outside a checkout.

## Proof language observed
The exact phrasing this funnel uses to build credibility — study the *mechanism* (specific numbers, named counts, guarantees), not the wording:
- `over {N} members` — e.g. "over 10,000 members"

## Measured design signals (facts, not a style to copy)
- Palette, area-weighted from live CSS:

| Hex | Usage | Likely role |
|-----|------:|-------------|
| `#f7f7f8` | 36.9% | background |
| `#131316` | 30.5% | support |
| `#ffffff` | 20.6% | background |
| `#0a0a0b` | 7.1% | support |
| `#212126` | 3.3% | support |
| `#f8f8f8` | 0.6% | background |
| `#2f3037` | 0.3% | support |
| `#25252a` | 0.2% | support |

- Type: display `geistNumbers`, body `geistNumbers` · size scale (px): 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 32, 64 · radius (px): 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16

## Funnel facts
- Depth reached: 3 steps
- Proof points: 1 across 1 steps
- Free-gift line items (max on a step): 0
- Discount/anchor pricing: no · Countdown: no · Subscription: yes
- Price continuity lander→checkout: not detected

---
_Full machine data: `tokens.json`, and the JSON bundle at api.uxxray.com. The value here is the analysis of a real competitor's funnel — what it does, what it doesn't, and the evidence for each._