UXXRAY · facts, not opinions Browse x-rays →
Above-the-fold capture of feeauditor.com
their above-the-fold, as captured

UXXRAY · Teardown dossier ◉ scanned Jul 15, 2026

feeauditor.com

saas · desktop

Biggest quick win

0% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

45 /100

Thin ★★☆☆☆ 5 measured categories

Score breakdown

  • Offer clarity 8/8
  • Action path 13/20
  • Trust & proof 0/11
  • Friction reduction 6/10
  • Value reinforcement 0/10

The funnel, frame by frame

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by stepmeasured
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest
3 tactics

$12 +9 more  ·  subscription

FAQTrust badgesPricing tiers
Compare Stripe Paypal Wise
02

Compare Stripe Paypal Wise

▼ thinnest
0 tactics

$100 +1 more  ·  subscription

no named tactics detected on this step

Offer

how clearly they present the deal and its valuemeasured
8/8highpoints earned
  • Pricing tiersfree, $1,750.00/mo, $1,888.75/mo, $9/mo

Action

the path to convert. CTA, sign-up, checkoutmeasured
13/20highpoints earned
  • Proof above the fold
  • Lead-capture form

Not detected: free trial / freemium and demo / docs entry.

Trust

proof, social proof, and credibilitymeasured
0/11nonepoints earned

No signals detected for this category on the captured funnel.

Not detected: trusted-by logo wall and usage / adoption proof.

Friction

objections answered, barriers removedmeasured
6/10highpoints earned
  • FAQ / objection handling

Not detected: free trial / freemium.

Value

why it’s worth it. comparison and reinforcementmeasured
0/10nonepoints earned

No signals detected for this category on the captured funnel.

Not detected: us-vs-them comparison and usage / adoption proof.

UX signals

measured UX quality. contrast · mobile · type · a11y · layoutmeasured
Minor
2 flags · 7 checks

Measured UX quality. flags, not opinions. Deterministic, evidence-backed, and kept separate from the conversion score.

Readability & contrast

WCAG AA on measurable text. worst offenders quoted, never a fail we can’t compute.
NEEDS WORKText contrast (WCAG AA)

0% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

worst: “$12 one-time unlock for the full report · Free preview first” at 1:1 (14px, #ffffff on #ffffff). needs 4.5:1

Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Mobile & tap targets

Responsive viewport + touch-target sizes where it matters.
GOODMobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Typography

Body size, line-height, line length. is the pitch actually readable?
NEEDS WORKBody text size

Smallest body text is 10px (base ~12px). below the ~16px readable floor.

Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

NOTELine length

18 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Cap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

Accessibility hygiene

Language, alt text, form labels, named controls, headings, link clarity.
GOODLanguage declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

GOODImage alt text

All 1 content images carry alt text.

NOTEForm labels

2 form fields rely on placeholder text as the only label.

Back placeholders with a real <label>. placeholder text vanishes on input.

Next move

Now line it up against a competitor.

Paste any URL. We’ll run the same scan, the same rubric, and put the two funnels side by side. category by category, all measured.

Live scan · 15-25 sec · same rubric · nothing is guessed

Brand kit

palette by on-page usage · type rendered livemeasured
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#ffffff
accent#ffffff
bg#ffffff
surface#ffffff
text#ffffff
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox60px
Jumps over the lazy dog30px
A subheading in their voice24px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three

Teardown report. copy for your LLM

the full evidence-based read: what this funnel does well, where it is thin, and the on-page proof for each. paste into any agent to learn from
feeauditor.com · 4/9 tactics · 0 proof templates · evidence-backed
# Agent Brief. build in the style of feeauditor.com

> Machine-extracted from a live on-demand funnel teardown (2026-07-15). 100% facts —
> measured tokens, detected patterns, harvested proof strings. No LLM interpretation.
> Single-page capture (MVP): homepage/landing page only, no funnel walk.
> Tokens: `tokens.json` / `tailwind.css`.

**Category (label):** —
**Funnel:** Homepage / Lander → Compare Stripe Paypal Wise

## Palette (area-weighted from live CSS)
| Hex | Usage | Likely role |
|-----|------:|-------------|
| `#ffffff` | 100% | background |

Curated roles: `primary=#ffffff` · `accent=#ffffff` · `bg=#ffffff` · `surface=#ffffff` · `text=#ffffff`

## Type
- Display: `ui-sans-serif`
- Body: `ui-sans-serif`
- Size scale (px): 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 30, 60
- Radius (px): 10, 14, 16, 33554400

## Patterns detected (fact-based). 4/9
- **FAQ / objection handling**. An accordion / FAQ block answering objections. _(home: Do you store my Stripe CSV file?)_
- **Proof above the fold**. Social proof rendered within the first viewport on at least one step. _(home: proof in first viewport)_
- **Pricing tiers**. Named plan tiers with per-month / per-seat pricing. _(home: free, $1,750.00/mo, $1,888.75/mo, $9/mo)_
- **Lead-capture form**. An on-page form collecting contact details (email / name / phone) outside a checkout. _(home: email, select, number, number)_

## Proof language (harvested strings → templates)
- _(none extracted)_

## Funnel facts
- Depth reached: 2 step(s) (single-page MVP capture)
- Proof points: 0 across 0 step(s)
- Discount/anchor pricing: no · Countdown: no · Subscription: yes

## To replicate
Match the palette + type tokens above and deploy the detected patterns. This is a single-page capture. no cart/checkout tactics were evaluated.