UXXRAY · facts, not opinions Browse x-rays →
Above-the-fold capture of figma.com
their above-the-fold, as captured

UXXRAY · Teardown dossier

figma.com

figma-com-2026-07-10-desktop

saas · desktop · 2026-07-10

45 /100

Thin ★★☆☆☆ brand avg across funnels desktop 45 · mobile 45 → avg

Score breakdown

  • Offer clarity 8/8
  • Action path 0/20
  • Trust & proof 6/11
  • Friction reduction 6/10
  • Value reinforcement 7/10

The funnel, frame by frame

see their whole funnel without clicking through it — scored step by stepmeasured
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

4 tactics
Sticky CTATrust badgesPressLogo wall
Pricing
02

Pricing

▲ strongest
6 tactics

$16 +7 more  ·  subscription

ComparisonFAQTrust badgesPressLogo wallPricing tiers
Signup
03

Signup

▼ thinnest
0 tactics

no named tactics detected on this step

Offer

how clearly they present the deal and its valuemeasured
8/8highpoints earned
  • Pricing tiersfree, $16/mo, $12/mo, $3/mo

Action

the path to convert — CTA, sign-up, checkoutmeasured
0/20nonepoints earned

No signals detected for this category on the captured funnel.

Not detected: proof above the fold, free trial / freemium, lead-capture form, and demo / docs entry.

Trust

proof, social proof, and credibilitymeasured
6/11partialpoints earned
  • Trusted-by logo wall

Not detected: usage / adoption proof.

Friction

objections answered, barriers removedmeasured
6/10highpoints earned
  • FAQ / objection handling

Not detected: free trial / freemium.

Value

why it’s worth it — comparison and reinforcementmeasured
7/10highpoints earned
  • Us-vs-them comparison

Not detected: usage / adoption proof.

Brand kit

palette by on-page usage · type rendered livemeasured
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#ffffff
accent#ffffff
bg#ffffff
surface#f3ffe3
text#000000
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox88px
Jumps over the lazy dog56px
A subheading in their voice44px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor — same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three

Teardown report — copy for your LLM

the full evidence-based read: what this funnel does well, where it is thin, and the on-page proof for each — paste into any agent to learn from
figma.com · 4/9 tactics · 0 proof templates · evidence-backed
# Funnel Teardown — figma.com

> An evidence-based read of figma.com's live conversion funnel, captured 2026-07-10.
> Every claim is measured from the page; each detected tactic carries the exact
> on-page string it fired on. Deterministic extraction — no LLM opinion. Read this
> to understand WHY this funnel converts (or leaks) — the persuasion principles it
> uses and the ones it's missing. It is a report to learn from, not a template to clone.

**Funnel type:** saas
**Evidence Coverage Score:** 45/100 (Thin)
**Path captured:** Homepage / Lander → Pricing → Signup

## Scorecard — where the points come from
| Category | Earned |
|----------|-------:|
| Offer clarity | 8 / 8 |
| Action path | 0 / 20 |
| Trust & proof | 6 / 11 |
| Friction reduction | 6 / 10 |
| Value reinforcement | 7 / 10 |
| Risk reversal & urgency | 0 / 0 |

## What's working — tactics in play, with proof
Each is a persuasion mechanism the funnel actually deploys; the quoted string is the on-page evidence.
- **Us-vs-them comparison** — A comparison table framing the brand against alternatives.  
  _Proof:_ `p2: Compare all features`
- **FAQ / objection handling** — An accordion / FAQ block answering objections.  
  _Proof:_ `p2: Pricing FAQs`
- **Trusted-by logo wall** — Customer/company logos or a "trusted by / used by" claim.  
  _Proof:_ `home: logos: A mock website showing Texture values, UI showing different brush stokes that can b`, `p2: backed by`
- **Pricing tiers** — Named plan tiers with per-month / per-seat pricing.  
  _Proof:_ `p2: free, $16/mo, $12/mo, $3/mo`

## What's missing — gaps for a saas funnel
Conversion tactics that apply to this funnel type but weren't found — the openings a competitor could exploit:
- **Proof above the fold** — not detected. Social proof rendered within the first viewport on at least one step.
- **Free trial / freemium** — not detected. A free trial, free tier, or "no credit card" entry offer.
- **Usage / adoption proof** — not detected. A count of developers / teams / companies / stars using the product.
- **Demo / docs entry** — not detected. A "book a demo" or documentation / API entry point.
- **Lead-capture form** — not detected. An on-page form collecting contact details (email / name / phone) outside a checkout.

## Proof language observed
The exact phrasing this funnel uses to build credibility — study the *mechanism* (specific numbers, named counts, guarantees), not the wording:
- _(none extracted)_

## Measured design signals (facts, not a style to copy)
- Palette, area-weighted from live CSS:

| Hex | Usage | Likely role |
|-----|------:|-------------|
| `#ffffff` | 94.5% | background |
| `#000000` | 5.4% | support |
| `#f3ffe3` | 0.1% | background |
| `#67ff7f` | 0% | accent/brand |

- Type: display `figmaSans`, body `figmaSans` · size scale (px): 12, 14, 16, 30, 44, 56, 88 · radius (px): 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, 40, 50

## Funnel facts
- Depth reached: 3 steps
- Proof points: 0 across 0 steps
- Free-gift line items (max on a step): 0
- Discount/anchor pricing: no · Countdown: no · Subscription: yes
- Price continuity lander→checkout: not detected

---
_Full machine data: `tokens.json`, and the JSON bundle at api.uxxray.com. The value here is the analysis of a real competitor's funnel — what it does, what it doesn't, and the evidence for each._