Measured daily · 181 funnels x-rayed · Facts, not opinions

Page Design Library

The shapes real pages are built from

Page design — single-page structure. Crawl enough funnels and the same handful of section skeletons keep recurring; each card is one page's shape, section by section, detected deterministically and drawn as a mini-mockup. Read top to bottom like the page itself. The trinity: Funnel designs (the play) → Page designs (the stack) → Section designs (the band). Same blocks, three zooms.

181 crawled 151 fully analyzed 8 recurring page shapes · 6 still being crawled to the footer
28% show up with nothing to prove it

42 of 151 fully-analyzed funnels have a hero and a call-to-action but zero proof or offer sections — no logo wall, no reviews, no pricing, no comparison. A hero and a hope. This is what "AI built it in an afternoon" looks like, measured.

where money is asked proof / credibility structure — read each stack top-to-bottom as the page
The Trust Wall
4 sections · hero, then a wall of customer logos
15 of 151 fully-analyzed funnels match this template (10%)
deathwishcoffee.com · digitalwilllocker.com · drinkolipop.com +12 more
The Pricing Page
5 sections · leads with price, backs it with an FAQ
8 of 151 fully-analyzed funnels match this template (5%)
fresh.ist · kwatch.io · ottiebox.com +5 more
Hero + Features
4 sections · ecommerce + saas
5 of 151 fully-analyzed funnels match this template (3%)
allbirds.com · myintelbrief.com · pentaton.app +2 more
Hero + Pricing
4 sections · ecommerce + saas
5 of 151 fully-analyzed funnels match this template (3%)
apple.com · appstackbuilder.com · chainmemory.ai +2 more
The Trust-and-Ask
5 sections · hero → social proof → straight to the ask
5 of 151 fully-analyzed funnels match this template (3%)
bertlo.com · figma.com · jonesroadbeauty.com +2 more
The Objection-Handler
5 sections · proof, then answers the doubts before asking
4 of 151 fully-analyzed funnels match this template (3%)
clerk.com · heyreplay.app · proxon.ai +1 more
The Explainer
5 sections · hero, FAQ, then the feature breakdown
3 of 151 fully-analyzed funnels match this template (2%)
ciaotutor.com · onprem-console.getoffgridai.co · wephora.com
Hero + Logo Wall + FAQ + CTA
6 sections · saas
3 of 151 fully-analyzed funnels match this template (2%)
replit.com · teaappgreenflags.com · wirevoxai.com
Emerging (2 funnels each — watching for a third to promote): nav → hero → logo_wall → logo_wall → footer · nav → hero → logo_wall → pricing → logo_wall → footer · nav → hero → comparison → faq → footer · nav → hero → feature_grid → logo_wall → pricing → faq → footer · nav → hero → logo_wall → pricing → faq → footer · nav → hero → pricing → faq → cta_band → footer · nav → hero → logo_wall → pricing → footer · nav → hero → pricing → email_capture → footer

X-ray your own funnel, free

Method: each crawled funnel's landing page is segmented into full-width bands; every band is classified into a section archetype (hero, logo wall, features, pricing, reviews, comparison, FAQ, CTA, footer…) by the same deterministic signals UXXRAY scores with — no LLM, no opinion. Pages are clustered by exact body-section sequence (chrome + generic sections ignored); a shape is a group with the identical skeleton. Only funnels crawled all the way to the footer, with a hero and at least one proof/offer section, are eligible — the 6 still mid-crawl and 24 we couldn't cleanly read are held back, not guessed. Scope: the 181 funnels we've crawled (SaaS-heavy today), auto-updating. A shape's NAME is our label for a measured cluster; the membership is the fact. 45 funnels have a structure shared with no other crawled funnel.