Above-the-fold capture of nanorhino.com
their above-the-fold, as captured

UXXRAY · Teardown dossier ◉ scanned Jul 25, 2026

nanorhino.com

content · desktop · Roentgen 1.8

Biggest quick win

77% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 37% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way. Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

2 of 5 conversion signals detected

30 /100 coverage

Sparse ★☆☆☆☆ weighted for impact · 3 measured categories

UXXRAY scans for 5 conversion tactics with deterministic rules. Unconventional builds may not register, so this is detection coverage, not a verdict. Scored by Roentgen 1.8; detection improves, so rescan anytime.

Score breakdown

  • Action path 0/7
  • Friction reduction 6/6
  • Value reinforcement 0/7

The funnel, frame by frame

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by stepmeasured
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest
3 tactics

$10 +1 more  ·  subscription

FAQPressFree trial
Compare
02

Compare

▼ thinnest
1 tactic

$10 +2 more  ·  subscription

Free trial

Action

the path to convert. CTA, sign-up, checkoutmeasured
0/7nonepoints earned

No signals detected for this category on the captured funnel.

Tactics we scan for but didn't detect

Add them to lift coverage, or tell us we missed one.

  • proof above the fold

Friction

objections answered, barriers removedmeasured
6/6highpoints earned
  • FAQ / objection handling

Value

why it’s worth it. comparison and reinforcementmeasured
0/7nonepoints earned

No signals detected for this category on the captured funnel.

Tactics we scan for but didn't detect

Add them to lift coverage, or tell us we missed one.

  • us-vs-them comparison

UX signals

measured UX quality. contrast · mobile · type · a11y · layoutmeasured
Leaky
3 flags · 7 checks

Measured UX quality. flags, not opinions. Deterministic, evidence-backed, and kept separate from the conversion score.

Readability & contrast

WCAG AA on measurable text. worst offenders quoted, never a fail we can’t compute.
NEEDS WORKText contrast (WCAG AA)

77% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 37% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

worst: “Accept All” at 1:1 (14px, #ffffff on #ffffff). needs 4.5:1

Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Mobile & tap targets

Responsive viewport + touch-target sizes where it matters.
GOODMobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Typography

Body size, line-height, line length. is the pitch actually readable?
NEEDS WORKBody text size

Smallest body text is 10px (base ~14px). below the ~16px readable floor.

Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

NOTELine length

8 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Cap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

Accessibility hygiene

Language, alt text, form labels, named controls, headings, link clarity.
GOODLanguage declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

GOODImage alt text

All 9 content images carry alt text.

NEEDS WORKNamed controls

3 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Add aria-label to icon-only buttons and links.

Next move

Now line it up against a competitor.

Paste any URL. We’ll run the same scan, the same rubric, and put the two funnels side by side. category by category, all measured.

Live scan · 15-25 sec · same rubric · nothing is guessed

Brand kit

palette by on-page usage · type rendered livemeasured
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#d73c63
accent#d73c63
bg#fffbf5
surface#ffffff
text#4a423b
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox60px
Jumps over the lazy dog56px
A subheading in their voice32px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three

Teardown report. copy for your LLM

the full evidence-based read: what this funnel does well, where it is thin, and the on-page proof for each. paste into any agent to learn from
nanorhino.com · 2/5 tactics · 0 proof templates · evidence-backed
# Agent Brief. build in the style of nanorhino.com

> Machine-extracted from a live on-demand funnel teardown (2026-07-25). 100% facts —
> measured tokens, detected patterns, harvested proof strings. No LLM interpretation.
> Single-page capture (MVP): homepage/landing page only, no funnel walk.
> Tokens: `tokens.json` / `tailwind.css`.

**Category (label):** —
**Funnel:** Homepage / Lander → Compare

## Palette (area-weighted from live CSS)
| Hex | Usage | Likely role |
|-----|------:|-------------|
| `#fffbf5` | 89.3% | background |
| `#ffffff` | 5.6% | background |
| `#1b1714` | 2.5% | support |
| `#d73c63` | 2.4% | accent/brand |
| `#fdf2f4` | 0.1% | background |
| `#fff3e6` | 0.1% | background |

Curated roles: `primary=#d73c63` · `accent=#d73c63` · `bg=#fffbf5` · `surface=#ffffff` · `text=#4a423b`

## Type
- Display: `Fraunces`
- Body: `Fraunces`
- Size scale (px): 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 32, 56, 60
- Radius (px): 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 33554400

## Patterns detected (fact-based). 2/5
- **FAQ / objection handling**. An accordion / FAQ block answering objections. _(home: What is NanoRhino?)_
- **Press / "as seen in"**. Media logos or an "as seen in / featured in" claim borrowing publication credibility. _(home: featured on)_

## Proof language (harvested strings → templates)
- _(none extracted)_

## Funnel facts
- Depth reached: 2 step(s) (single-page MVP capture)
- Proof points: 0 across 0 step(s)
- Discount/anchor pricing: no · Countdown: no · Subscription: yes

## To replicate
Match the palette + type tokens above and deploy the detected patterns. This is a single-page capture. no cart/checkout tactics were evaluated.