sourclip.com
Beats 47%.
of 1,501 multi-step SaaS funnels. It runs 5 of 11 selling tactics. 3 of 12 UX checks pass.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Across all 1,986 multi-step funnels: beats 55%.
Peer rank
Beats 47%.
of 1,501 multi-step SaaS funnels. Across all 1,986 multi-step funnels: beats 55%.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“A whole research workflow for NotebookLM.”
- Sign in
- See Sourclip in action
- Monthly
- Yearly Best value
- Get Pro — yearly
- Copy
- Buy lifetime
- What exactly is Sourclip? +
How it’s built
12 UX checks · 6 need work · 3 pass · 3 notes · 0 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
87% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 8px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Page weight
At least 14.1 MB across 49 measurable resources. 89 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.
See all 12 checks
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line length
1 paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 12 content images carry alt text.
Heading levels
1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.
Render-blocking resources
8 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Oversized images
25 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Landmark regions
No <header> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
Tap-target size (mobile)
102 of 150 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
How it looks
Inter Tight for headlines, Inter for text. 10 colours measured.
Worth borrowing
Proof above the fold: 16% of funnels have it (430 of 2675). This site does.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
5 of 11 selling tactics found: Proof above the fold, Us-vs-them comparison, Pricing tiers, Trusted-by logo wall, Free trial / freemium. 6 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 6 it lacks
- Demo / docs entry34% of funnels have it (623 of 1,853).
- Lead-capture form26% of funnels have it (483 of 1,853).
- Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (312 of 2,284).
- Press / "as seen in"24% of funnels have it (628 of 2,672).
- FAQ / objection handling68% of funnels have it (1,809 of 2,675).
- Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (138 of 2,672).
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour and size
Proof above the fold · the evidence
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 5 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Proof above the fold · the evidence
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
FAQ / objection handling · who has it
Demo / docs entry · who has it
Lead-capture form · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 12 on the first page
Prices seen · 8
Plus
Colours and type, in full.
Every colour and size we measured.
Colours · 10 measured, with their share
Type · Inter Tight, 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Compare
Put your site next to sourclip.com.
Every number, side by side.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.