subshack.pro
Beats 43%.
of 339 entry-page SaaS funnels. It runs 3 of 11 selling tactics. 6 of 12 UX checks pass.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Across all 691 entry-page captures: beats 63%.
Peer rank
Beats 43%.
of 339 entry-page SaaS funnels. Across all 691 entry-page captures: beats 63%.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“See what actually grows your Substack”
- Audit your Substack free
- Fill template
- Insert
- Regenerate
- Sync archive
- Articles
- Replies
- Notes
How it’s built
12 UX checks · 3 need work · 6 pass · 3 notes · 0 not measured
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Render-blocking resources
9 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Tap-target size (mobile)
37 of 54 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
See all 12 checks
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line length
6 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 4 content images carry alt text.
Label in name
1 control has an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
Page weight
At least 0.6 MB across 33 measurable resources. 5 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.
Oversized images
1 image is shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Inline validation
1 field carries validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).
How it looks
Inter for headlines and text. 10 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
3 of 11 selling tactics found: FAQ / objection handling, Trusted-by logo wall, Free trial / freemium. 8 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 8 it lacks
- Demo / docs entry33% of funnels have it (629 of 1,882).
- Lead-capture form26% of funnels have it (488 of 1,882).
- Proof above the fold16% of funnels have it (437 of 2,712).
- Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (319 of 2,329).
- Press / "as seen in"22% of funnels have it (608 of 2,709).
- Us-vs-them comparison19% of funnels have it (522 of 2,712).
- Pricing tiers50% of SaaS funnels have it (943 of 1,873).
- Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (136 of 2,709).
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour and size
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 3 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Pricing tiers · who has it
Demo / docs entry · who has it
Lead-capture form · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 12 on the first page
Prices seen · 1
Plus
Colours and type, in full.
Every colour and size we measured.
Colours · 10 measured, with their share
Type · Inter, 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Compare
Put your site next to subshack.pro.
Every number, side by side.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.