superbillgen.com
Beats 3%.
of 1,502 multi-step SaaS funnels. It runs 2 of 11 selling tactics. 4 of 11 UX checks pass.


How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Across all 1,987 multi-step funnels: beats 11%.
Peer rank
Beats 3%.
of 1,502 multi-step SaaS funnels. Across all 1,987 multi-step funnels: beats 11%.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Superbills your clients can actually submit.”
- Start free
How it’s built
11 UX checks · 3 need work · 4 pass · 3 notes · 1 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
94% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
Named controls
12 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Tap-target size (mobile)
20 of 24 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
See all 11 checks
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 14px; first paragraph 18px.
Line length
51 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 3 content images carry alt text.
Skip link
No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
Page weight
At least 0.0 MB across 3 measurable resources, but 9 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Landmark regions
No <main> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
How it looks
Georgia for headlines, -apple-system for text. 3 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
2 of 11 selling tactics found: FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 9 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 9 it lacks
- Demo / docs entry34% of funnels have it (623 of 1,853).
- Lead-capture form26% of funnels have it (483 of 1,853).
- Proof above the fold16% of funnels have it (430 of 2,675).
- Trusted-by logo wall72% of funnels have it (1,634 of 2,284).
- Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (312 of 2,284).
- Press / "as seen in"24% of funnels have it (628 of 2,672).
- Us-vs-them comparison19% of funnels have it (510 of 2,675).
- Pricing tiers51% of SaaS funnels have it (934 of 1,844).
- Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (138 of 2,672).
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour and size
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 2 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Trusted-by logo wall · who has it
Pricing tiers · who has it
Demo / docs entry · who has it
Lead-capture form · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 1 on the first page
Prices seen · 1
Plus
Colours and type, in full.
Every colour and size we measured.
Colours · 3 measured, with their share
Type · Georgia, 9 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Compare
Put your site next to superbillgen.com.
Every number, side by side.

On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.