Above-the-fold capture of web4browser.io
their above-the-fold, as captured

UXXRAY · Teardown dossier ◉ scanned Jul 24, 2026

web4browser.io

saas · desktop · Roentgen 1.7

Biggest quick win

93% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 22% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way. Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

5 of 11 conversion signals detected

65 /100 coverage

Partial ★★★☆☆ weighted for impact · 5 measured categories

UXXRAY scans for 11 conversion tactics with deterministic rules. Unconventional builds may not register, so this is detection coverage, not a verdict. Scored by Roentgen 1.7; detection improves, so rescan anytime.

Score breakdown

  • Offer clarity 8/8
  • Action path 6/20
  • Trust & proof 6/11
  • Friction reduction 10/10
  • Value reinforcement 7/10

The funnel, frame by frame

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by stepmeasured
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

2 tactics

2 proof points

ReviewsFAQ
Features.Html
02

Features.Html

1 tactic
Reviews
Solutions.Html
03

Solutions.Html

▼ thinnest
0 tactics

no named tactics detected on this step

Pricing.Html
04

Pricing.Html

▲ strongest
5 tactics

$0.00 +10 more  ·  10% off  ·  1 proof point

ComparisonFree trialLogo wallPricing tiersExpress pay

Offer

how clearly they present the deal and its valuemeasured
8/8highpoints earned
  • Pricing tiersfree, $0/mo, $9/mo, $19/mo

Action

the path to convert. CTA, sign-up, checkoutmeasured
6/20partialpoints earned
  • Free trial / freemiumfree plan

Tactics we scan for but didn't detect

Add them to lift coverage, or tell us we missed one.

  • proof above the fold
  • lead-capture form
  • demo / docs entry

Trust

proof, social proof, and credibilitymeasured
6/11partialpoints earned
  • Trusted-by logo wall

Tactics we scan for but didn't detect

Add them to lift coverage, or tell us we missed one.

  • usage / adoption proof

Friction

objections answered, barriers removedmeasured
10/10highpoints earned
  • FAQ / objection handling
  • Free trial / freemiumfree plan

Value

why it’s worth it. comparison and reinforcementmeasured
7/10highpoints earned
  • Us-vs-them comparisoncomparison grid: 11 rows

Tactics we scan for but didn't detect

Add them to lift coverage, or tell us we missed one.

  • usage / adoption proof

UX signals

measured UX quality. contrast · mobile · type · a11y · layoutmeasured
Leaky
3 flags · 7 checks

Measured UX quality. flags, not opinions. Deterministic, evidence-backed, and kept separate from the conversion score.

Readability & contrast

WCAG AA on measurable text. worst offenders quoted, never a fail we can’t compute.
NEEDS WORKText contrast (WCAG AA)

93% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 22% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

worst: “From profile setup to reviewed execution” at 1:1 (38px, #ffffff on #ffffff). needs 3:1

Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Mobile & tap targets

Responsive viewport + touch-target sizes where it matters.
GOODMobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Typography

Body size, line-height, line length. is the pitch actually readable?
NEEDS WORKBody text size

Smallest body text is 9px (base ~12px). below the ~16px readable floor.

Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

NOTELine length

4 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Cap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

Accessibility hygiene

Language, alt text, form labels, named controls, headings, link clarity.
GOODLanguage declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

GOODImage alt text

All 128 content images carry alt text.

NEEDS WORKNamed controls

37 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Add aria-label to icon-only buttons and links.

Next move

Now line it up against a competitor.

Paste any URL. We’ll run the same scan, the same rubric, and put the two funnels side by side. category by category, all measured.

Live scan · 15-25 sec · same rubric · nothing is guessed

Brand kit

palette by on-page usage · type rendered livemeasured
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#032452
accent#032452
bg#ffffff
surface#f3f7fd
text#63738d
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox30px
Jumps over the lazy dog24px
A subheading in their voice20px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three

Teardown report. copy for your LLM

the full evidence-based read: what this funnel does well, where it is thin, and the on-page proof for each. paste into any agent to learn from
web4browser.io · 5/11 tactics · 3 proof templates · evidence-backed
# Agent Brief. build in the style of web4browser.io

> Machine-extracted from a live on-demand funnel teardown (2026-07-24). 100% facts —
> measured tokens, detected patterns, harvested proof strings. No LLM interpretation.
> Single-page capture (MVP): homepage/landing page only, no funnel walk.
> Tokens: `tokens.json` / `tailwind.css`.

**Category (label):** —
**Funnel:** Homepage / Lander → Features.Html → Solutions.Html → Pricing.Html

## Palette (area-weighted from live CSS)
| Hex | Usage | Likely role |
|-----|------:|-------------|
| `#ffffff` | 72.6% | background |
| `#010e27` | 13.9% | support |
| `#032452` | 5.4% | support |
| `#f3f7fd` | 3.8% | background |
| `#062852` | 1.5% | support |
| `#0867f5` | 0.6% | accent/brand |
| `#f7faff` | 0.5% | background |
| `#f4f8fe` | 0.4% | background |

Curated roles: `primary=#032452` · `accent=#032452` · `bg=#ffffff` · `surface=#f3f7fd` · `text=#63738d`

## Type
- Display: `Poppins`
- Body: `DM Sans`
- Size scale (px): 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 24, 30
- Radius (px): 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 50

## Patterns detected (fact-based). 5/11
- **Us-vs-them comparison**. A comparison table framing the brand against alternatives. _(p4: comparison grid: 11 rows)_
- **FAQ / objection handling**. An accordion / FAQ block answering objections. _(home: Help Frequently Asked Questions Learn how profile isolation, proxy management and browser )_
- **Free trial / freemium**. A free trial, free tier, or "no credit card" entry offer. _(p4: free plan)_
- **Trusted-by logo wall**. Customer/company logos or a "trusted by / used by" claim. _(p4: logos: Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, Alipay, WeChat Pay)_
- **Pricing tiers**. Named plan tiers with per-month / per-seat pricing. _(p4: free, $0/mo, $9/mo, $19/mo)_

## Proof language (harvested strings → templates)
- `{N}+ reviews`. e.g. "200+ reviews"
- `{X} / 5`. e.g. "4.7 / 5"
- `{N}% off`. e.g. "10% off"

## Funnel facts
- Depth reached: 4 step(s) (single-page MVP capture)
- Proof points: 3 across 2 step(s)
- Discount/anchor pricing: yes · Countdown: no · Subscription: no

## To replicate
Match the palette + type tokens above and deploy the detected patterns. This is a single-page capture. no cart/checkout tactics were evaluated.