daymilo.com

Beats 68%.

of 339 entry-page SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

daymilo.com desktop capture of the first page
Scanned 2026-10-31SaaS

What sets it apart

daymilo.com does 2 things few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 339 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Us-vs-them comparison

    Rarity

    Only 8%.

    of 339 SaaS funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.

    8 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 92 wait outside.

    26 of 339 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    daymilo.com Homepage / Lander capture, where it does this
    Where daymilo.com does it · Homepage / Lander: “comparison table: Service · Stops per route (free) · Reorders stops for you”

    FOUND. Only 8% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. daymilo.com does. 26 of 339 SaaS funnels.

  2. Demo / docs entry

    Rarity

    Only 18%.

    of 339 SaaS funnels have demo / docs entry. This site is one of them.

    18 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 82 wait outside.

    61 of 339 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    daymilo.com Homepage / Lander capture, where it does this
    Where daymilo.com does it · Homepage / Lander: “docs link”

    FOUND. Only 18% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. daymilo.com does. 61 of 339 SaaS funnels.

What it skips

daymilo.com misses 1 thing most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 68%.

of 339 entry-page SaaS funnels.

beats 68% of 339 entry-page SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Free Multi-Stop Route Planner — Send the Route to a Driver's Phone”

  • My routes
  • Sign in
  • Watch the demo 1:39
  • Use my location
  • ×
  • Paste addresses
  • + Add one stop
  • Try 8 sample stops

How it’s built

26 UX checks · 18 pass · 3 need work · 3 notes · 2 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 2 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Form labels

All 3 form fields carry a label.

Pass

Named controls

Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.

Show the other 20 checks
Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Heading levels

No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (54 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Page weight

At least 0.8 MB across 65 measurable resources. 16 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

Pass

Landmark regions

The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Pass

Input types

No email or phone field uses type="text".

Pass

Autocomplete hints

3 of 4 fields carry an autocomplete attribute.

Pass

Inline validation

2 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).

Note

Line length

5 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Oversized images

1 image is shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Render-blocking resources

17 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

47 of 48 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Line height

No body line-height was captured for this page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Seen on the page

The sections of daymilo.com where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • FAQ / objection handling1 crop
    • daymilo.com FAQ section, Homepage / Lander
      FAQ · Homepage / Lander

How it looks

Inter for headlines and text. 9 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Us-vs-them comparison: Only 8% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. daymilo.com does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

4 of 11 selling tactics found: Us-vs-them comparison, Demo / docs entry, Free trial / freemium, FAQ / objection handling. 7 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 7 it lacks
    • Trusted-by logo wall60% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. daymilo.com doesn't. Gap
    • Pricing tiersOnly 22% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 17% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 10% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Lead-capture formOnly 10% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 9% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 3% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 4 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Trusted-by logo wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 12 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 9 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 12 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.34.0 on 2026-10-31, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 19 links seen, 7 walkable, and 0 matched a funnel step. If this funnel continues past the entry page, we did not reach it — everything below is measured from the entry page alone.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · daymilo.com · Compare

← Back to the daymilo.com report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to daymilo.com?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

daymilo.com

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.