flow-mrr.com
Beats 21%.
of 349 entry-page SaaS funnels. It runs 2 of 11 selling tactics. 5 of 11 UX checks pass.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Across all 691 entry-page captures: beats 42%.
Peer rank
Beats 21%.
of 349 entry-page SaaS funnels. Across all 691 entry-page captures: beats 42%.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Stripe revenue analytics & recovery for SaaS”
- EN
- FR
- Watch the demo
- Yearly SAVE 25%
- Monthly
- Start free
- Try Pro
How it’s built
11 UX checks · 3 need work · 5 pass · 3 notes · 0 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
70% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 21% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 9px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Tap-target size (mobile)
29 of 40 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
See all 11 checks
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line length
6 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 3 content images carry alt text.
Skip link
No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
Page weight
At least 0.6 MB across 60 measurable resources.
Render-blocking resources
3 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Landmark regions
No <main> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
How it looks
Inter for headlines and text. 10 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
2 of 11 selling tactics found: Pricing tiers, Free trial / freemium. 9 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 9 it lacks
- Demo / docs entry34% of funnels have it (620 of 1,837).
- Lead-capture form26% of funnels have it (476 of 1,837).
- Proof above the fold16% of funnels have it (426 of 2,651).
- Trusted-by logo wall72% of funnels have it (1,621 of 2,257).
- Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (306 of 2,257).
- Press / "as seen in"24% of funnels have it (634 of 2,648).
- Us-vs-them comparison19% of funnels have it (506 of 2,651).
- FAQ / objection handling68% of funnels have it (1,792 of 2,651).
- Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (138 of 2,648).
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour and size
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 2 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Trusted-by logo wall · who has it
FAQ / objection handling · who has it
Demo / docs entry · who has it
Lead-capture form · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 7 on the first page
Prices seen · 9
Plus
Colours and type, in full.
Every colour and size we measured.
Colours · 10 measured, with their share
Type · Inter, 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Compare
Put your site next to flow-mrr.com.
Every number, side by side.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.