This report was measured 46 days ago — past our freshness window.

Site report · SaaS · Scanned 2026-09-10

imgenhancer.co

Beats 24%.

of 1,480 multi-step SaaS funnels. It runs 4 of 11 selling tactics. 7 of 15 UX checks pass.

imgenhancer.co desktop capture of the first page

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Across all 1,961 multi-step funnels: beats 36%.

Peer rank

Beats 24%.

of 1,480 multi-step SaaS funnels. Across all 1,961 multi-step funnels: beats 36%.

beats 24% of 1480 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“AI Image Enhancer Free Online”

  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • Get Free Enhancement
  • Try Sample Image
  • What is AI image enhancer free?
  • How can I enhance an image online?
  • Can an AI image enhancer fix a blurry photo?
  • Can this image enhancer upscale an image?

How it’s built

15 UX checks · 4 need work · 7 pass · 4 notes · 0 not measured

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 12px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Oversized images

11 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Landmark regions

No <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

See all 15 checks
Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Note

Line length

6 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 13 content images carry alt text.

Note

Label in name

2 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

Pass

Page weight

At least 1.6 MB across 69 measurable resources. 9 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

1 stylesheet/script in <head> block first paint.

Note

Keyboard reachability

1 element looks clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

Note

Autocomplete hints

No autocomplete attributes across 3 fields. browsers cannot autofill.

Pass

Inline validation

3 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

68 of 97 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

How it looks

Bricolage Grotesque for headlines and text. 6 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Lead-capture form: 26% of funnels have it (476 of 1837). This site does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

4 of 11 selling tactics found: Lead-capture form, FAQ / objection handling, Trusted-by logo wall, Free trial / freemium. 7 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 7 it lacks
    • Demo / docs entry34% of funnels have it (620 of 1,837).
    • Proof above the fold16% of funnels have it (426 of 2,651).
    • Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (306 of 2,257).
    • Press / "as seen in"24% of funnels have it (634 of 2,648).
    • Us-vs-them comparison19% of funnels have it (506 of 2,651).
    • Pricing tiers51% of SaaS funnels have it (925 of 1,828).
    • Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (138 of 2,648).

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour and size

Lead-capture form · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 4 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Lead-capture form · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Pricing tiers · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 12 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 6

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colours and type, in full.

Every colour and size we measured.

Colours · 6 measured, with their share

Plus · $29/mo

Type · Bricolage Grotesque, 11 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Get Plus · $29/moOpening soon.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.27.0 on 2026-09-10, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 21 links on the entry page, 15 walkable. 2 matched a funnel step; we captured 3 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Compare

Put your site next to imgenhancer.co.

Every number, side by side.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.