saas · Aug 21, 2026

lizard.build

45/100 Thin

Scores above 42% of 1,252 multi-step funnels we have measured. Among the 959 saas funnels in that group, above 31%.

4/11 tactics
2 steps
11 checks
4 flagged

How this was measured

Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel.

Measured by Roentgen 1.25.1, one of our versioned rulesets. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

Walk 25 links seen, 15 walkable, 1 matched, and we walked 2 pages.

Captured Homepage / Lander — Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 2

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

2 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measured

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest

7 tactics

$2.8906 +12 more

Sticky CTACountdownFAQFree trialNo cardLogo wallDemo / docs

Pricing

▼ thinnest

3 tactics

$0 +7 more · subscription

Sticky CTANo cardDemo / docs

In their own words

42 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measured

Page title: Lizard – AI-Native Cloud Deployment Platform
Meta description: Lizard is the AI-native deployment platform for coding agents. Ship from Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor - managed Postgres, Redis, S3, and agent-readable logs.
Headline: AI-native deployment platform for coding agents
Section headings: Focus on product, not infrastructure.Whatever your stack, it runs on Lizard.Most of your cloud bill is idle timeBuilt for agents, not adapted for themFrequently asked questionsBuild with AI. Ship with Lizard.Git push to deployPostgres, Redis or S3 in one command+6 more, not shown
Buttons and links: ProductBook a demoRender $146Fly.io $98.99AWS $55.66DigitalOcean $54.45How do I deploy from Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor?Do I need a credit card to try Lizard?How much does it cost to run a small app on Lizard?Which languages and frameworks does Lizard support?+2 more, not shown
Prices on the page: $2.8906$3.3358$0.0666$0.3515$0.0000$6.6203$32.57$55.66+5 more, not shown

Sections

7 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measured

Nav section of lizard.build — **Nav**0% down the page

Hero section of lizard.build — **Hero**0% down the page

Logos section of lizard.build — **Logos**42% down the page

Pricing section of lizard.build — **Pricing**47% down the page

FAQ section of lizard.build — **FAQ**76% down the page

CTA section of lizard.build — **CTA**88% down the page

Footer section of lizard.build — **Footer**94% down the page

Elements

1 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measured

No credit card element — **No credit card**“No credit card required”

What we found

4 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measured

Action path2 of 4

Offers a free trial or free tier Free plan

Offers a demo or docs entry point Book a demo

Trust & proof1 of 2

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim logos: Lizard dashboard preview, us-virginia, Postgres, Redis, Node.js

Friction reduction2 of 2

Answers buyer objections Frequently asked questions

Offers a free trial or free tier Free plan

What we didn’t find

7 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measured

What we didn’t see7 of 11 applicable

Pricing tiers 636 of 1248 measured funnels run this

Press / "as seen in" 448 of 1769 measured funnels run this

Lead-capture form 310 of 1256 measured funnels run this

Us-vs-them comparison 304 of 1777 measured funnels run this

Proof above the fold 292 of 1777 measured funnels run this

Usage / adoption proof 224 of 1369 measured funnels run this

Scarcity / urgency copy 94 of 1769 measured funnels run this

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

11 run · 4 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measured

Readability & contrast1 flagged

Text contrast (WCAG AA) needs workcontrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

81% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 16% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

worst: “/mo” at 3.1:1 (13px, #5f646d on #141414). needs 4.5:1

fix Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Mobile & tap targetsclear

Mobile viewport passesmobile:mobile-viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Typography1 flagged

Body text size needs worktype:body-text-size

Smallest body text is 9px (base ~18px). below the ~16px readable floor.

fix Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Line length notetype:line-length

15 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

fix Cap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

Accessibility hygiene1 flagged

Weight & delivery1 flagged

Page weight not measurableweight:page-weight

At least 0.5 MB across 25 measurable resources, but 12 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Render-blocking resources passesweight:render-blocking-resources

1 stylesheet/script in <head> block first paint.

fix Defer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.

Oversized images needs workweight:oversized-images

16 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“redis.svg” is 800px wide, displayed at 28px

fix Serve responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.