This report was measured 51 days ago — past our freshness window.

saas · Aug 21, 2026

lizard.build

We found more conversion tactics here than on 23% of the 1,350 multi-step SaaS funnels we have measured.

4 conversion tactics detected

2 pages walked · measured by Roentgen 1.25.1

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel
How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.25.1 on 2026-08-21. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

Against all 1,781 multi-step funnels, more conversion tactics than 34% of them.

Walk 25 links on the entry page, 15 walkable. 1 matched a funnel step; we captured 2 pages in all, this one included.

The short version, in 5 parts

  1. Proven on the page

    4 conversion tactics detected, each backed by text on the page

    Answers buyer objections
    Frequently asked questions
    Offers a free trial or free tier
    Free plan
    Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim
    logos: Lizard dashboard preview, us-virginia, Postgres, Redis, Node.js

    + 1 more with evidence

    See all 4

  2. Not seen

    7 of 11 applicable tactics we checked for and did not see

    Pricing tiers
    Named plan tiers with per-month / per-seat pricing.
    Press / "as seen in"
    Media logos or an "as seen in / featured in" claim borrowing publication credib…
    Us-vs-them comparison
    A comparison table framing the brand against alternatives.

    + 4 more

    See what we looked for

  3. Flagged

    5 of 12 build checks flagged, each with a fix

    Text contrast (WCAG AA)
    81% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 16% of text was unmeasurable (over i…
    Body text size
    Smallest body text is 9px (base ~18px). below the ~16px readable floor.
    Named controls
    1 button/link has no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

    + 2 more

    See the fixes

  4. Walked

    2 pages walked, Homepage / Lander to Pricing

    Step 1
    Homepage / Lander
    Step 2
    Pricing

    Walk it frame by frame

  5. In their words

    The headline: AI-native deployment platform for coding agents

    Promise
    Lizard is the AI-native deployment platform for coding agents. Ship from Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor - mana…
    Prices shown
    $2.8906 · $3.3358 · $0.0666

    Read every quote

Captured Homepage / Lander
Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 2

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

2 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

▲ strongest
7 tactics

$2.8906 +12 more

Sticky CTACountdownFAQFree trialNo cardLogo wallDemo / docs
Pricing
02

Pricing

▼ thinnest
3 tactics

$0 +7 more  ·  subscription

Sticky CTANo cardDemo / docs

In their own words

42 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Page title
Lizard – AI-Native Cloud Deployment Platform
Meta description
Lizard is the AI-native deployment platform for coding agents. Ship from Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor - managed Postgres, Redis, S3, and agent-readable logs.
Headline
AI-native deployment platform for coding agents
Section headings
Focus on product, not infrastructure.Whatever your stack, it runs on Lizard.Most of your cloud bill is idle timeBuilt for agents, not adapted for themFrequently asked questionsBuild with AI. Ship with Lizard.Git push to deployPostgres, Redis or S3 in one command+6 more, not shown
Buttons and links
ProductBook a demoRender $146Fly.io $98.99AWS $55.66DigitalOcean $54.45How do I deploy from Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor?Do I need a credit card to try Lizard?How much does it cost to run a small app on Lizard?Which languages and frameworks does Lizard support?+2 more, not shown
Prices on the page
$2.8906$3.3358$0.0666$0.3515$0.0000$6.6203$32.57$55.66+5 more, not shown

Sections

7 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Nav section of lizard.build
Nav0% down the page
Hero section of lizard.build
Hero0% down the page
Logos section of lizard.build
Logos42% down the page
Pricing section of lizard.build
Pricing47% down the page
FAQ section of lizard.build
FAQ76% down the page
CTA section of lizard.build
CTA88% down the page
Footer section of lizard.build
Footer94% down the page

Elements

1 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
No credit card element
No credit card“No credit card required”

What we found

4 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

objection1 of 2

Answers buyer objections Frequently asked questions

proof1 of 4

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim logos: Lizard dashboard preview, us-virginia, Postgres, Redis, Node.js

offer1 of 2

Offers a free trial or free tier Free plan

checkout1 of 2

Offers a demo or docs entry point Book a demo

What we didn’t find

7 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

What we didn’t see7 of 11 applicable

Pricing tiers 873 of the 1,673 SaaS funnels we checked
Press / "as seen in" 642 of the 2,417 funnels we checked
Us-vs-them comparison 441 of the 2,420 funnels we checked
Lead-capture form 437 of the 1,683 funnels we checked
Proof above the fold 381 of the 2,420 funnels we checked
Usage / adoption proof 289 of the 2,043 funnels we checked
Scarcity / urgency copy 125 of the 2,417 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

12 run · 5 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

5 of 11 measured checks need work1 could not be measured — not counted either way

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

contrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

81% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 16% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

worst: “/mo” at 3.1:1 (13px, #5f646d on #141414). needs 4.5:1

FixRaise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest body text is 9px (base ~18px). below the ~16px readable floor.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Named controls

a11y:named-controls

1 button/link has no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

FixAdd aria-label to icon-only buttons and links.

Oversized images

weight:oversized-images

16 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“redis.svg” is 800px wide, displayed at 28px

FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

49 of 65 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Open menu” at 20×20px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing2

Line length

15 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length

Not measurable1

Page weight

At least 0.5 MB across 25 measurable resources, but 12 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

weight:page-weight

Clear4

Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text · Render-blocking resources

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#10b981
accent#10b981
bg#ffffff
surface#ffffff
text#858b94
See the roles applied
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox32px
Jumps over the lazy dog24px
A subheading in their voice20px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three
Type scale, weights & families
SIZE SCALE
9pxAa
10pxAa
11pxAa
12pxAa
13pxAa
14pxAa
15pxAa
16pxAa
17pxAa
20pxAa
24pxAa
32pxAa
WEIGHTS
Aa400
Aa500
Aa600
Aa700
FAMILIES
Geist
rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

1 of 9 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

We ran this pass on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

Similar crawls