This report was measured 48 days ago — past our freshness window.

Site report · Content · Scanned 2026-09-11

manifold.markets

Beats 21%.

of 693 entry-page captures. It runs 1 of 7 selling tactics. 3 of 11 UX checks pass.

manifold.markets desktop capture of the first page

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Peer rank

Beats 21%.

of 693 entry-page captures.

beats 21% of 693 entry-page captures. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Manifold”

  • App
  • Sign up
  • Open options More
  • All
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Sports
  • Culture

How it’s built

11 UX checks · 5 need work · 3 pass · 3 notes · 0 not measured

Needs work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

91% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

Needs work

Named controls

5 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Needs work

Page weight

At least 5.6 MB across 215 measurable resources. 35 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

See all 11 checks
Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 14px; first paragraph 16px.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Note

Heading structure

The landing page has no <h1>.

Needs work

Render-blocking resources

89 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Note

Oversized images

1 image is shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Note

Landmark regions

No <header> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

118 of 164 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

How it looks

icomoon for headlines and text. 10 colours measured.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

1 of 7 selling tactic found: Trusted-by logo wall. 6 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 6 it lacks
    • Proof above the fold16% of funnels have it (438 of 2,714).
    • Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (318 of 2,332).
    • Press / "as seen in"22% of funnels have it (601 of 2,711).
    • Us-vs-them comparison19% of funnels have it (521 of 2,714).
    • FAQ / objection handling68% of funnels have it (1,841 of 2,714).
    • Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (136 of 2,711).

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour and size

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 1 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

FAQ / objection handling · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 12 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 7

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colours and type, in full.

Every colour and size we measured.

Colours · 10 measured, with their share

Plus · $29/mo

Type · icomoon, 5 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Get Plus · $29/moOpening soon.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.27.0 on 2026-09-11, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Measured from a 1-page capture. We did not walk past the entry page, so signals that live deeper in a funnel could not be seen.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Compare

Put your site next to manifold.markets.

Every number, side by side.