saas · Aug 15, 2026

mentionagent.ai

65/100 Partial

Scores above 95% of 525 entry-page captures we have measured. Among the 289 saas funnels in that group, above 94%.

6/11 tactics
1 step
15 checks
4 flagged

Walk 23 links seen, 7 walkable, and 0 matched a funnel step. If this funnel continues past the entry page, we did not reach it — everything below is measured from the entry page alone.

How this was measured

Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel.

Measured by Roentgen 1.25.1, one of our versioned rulesets. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

Scan

Captured Homepage / Lander — Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 1

What we recorded

Progress

2 scans

this funnel’s coverage score across measured re-scans

measured

0pts since the first measured scan (2026-08-12) — 2 re-scans

65 Partial 2026-08-12
→
65 Partial 2026-08-15

The funnel, frame by frame

1 step walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measured

Homepage / Lander

8 tactics

$7 +6 more · subscription · 1 proof point

ComparisonFAQTrust badgesPressFree trialNo cardLogo wallPricing tiers

In their own words

34 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measured

Page title: MentionAgent | AI Link Building & Outreach on Autopilot
Meta description: AI link building for SaaS, agencies, and local businesses. The agent finds relevant blogs, writes personalized pitches, and earns editorial backlinks on autopilot. From $129/mo.
Headline: Get mentioned on the blogs AI cites
Section headings: Why mentions and editorial backlinks matterHow the link building agent worksWhat lands a mentionSee where AI recommends youBlogger outreach and backlink automation, in one toolWhat link building outreach actually costsHere is the whole dealSimple, transparent pricing+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links: Start freeScan my siteTelegram botWeb dashboardApprove & SendEditSkipCheck DR
Prices on the page: $7$30$49$165$500$751$129

Sections

7 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measured

Nav section of mentionagent.ai — **Nav**3% down the page

Hero section of mentionagent.ai — **Hero**0% down the page

CTA section of mentionagent.ai — **CTA**3% down the page

Pricing section of mentionagent.ai — **Pricing**43% down the page

FAQ section of mentionagent.ai — **FAQ**78% down the page

Logos section of mentionagent.ai — **Logos**93% down the page

Footer section of mentionagent.ai — **Footer**95% down the page

Elements

2 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measured

Price anchor element — **Price anchor**“$751+/mo”

Guarantee element — **Guarantee**“14-day money-back guarantee. No questions asked.”

What we found

6 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measured

Offer clarity1 of 1

Makes the pricing ladder explicit free, $7/mo, $30/mo, $49/mo

Action path1 of 4

Offers a free trial or free tier Start free

Trust & proof1 of 2

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim logo wall (4 distinct marks)

Friction reduction2 of 2

Answers buyer objections What is agentic outreach? Is MentionAgent backlink software or a link building service? Ho

Offers a free trial or free tier Start free

Value reinforcement1 of 2

Compares itself against alternatives comparison grid: 7 rows

What we didn’t find

5 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measured

What we didn’t see5 of 11 applicable

Demo / docs entry 440 of 1256 measured funnels run this

Lead-capture form 310 of 1256 measured funnels run this

Proof above the fold 292 of 1777 measured funnels run this

Usage / adoption proof 224 of 1369 measured funnels run this

Scarcity / urgency copy 94 of 1769 measured funnels run this

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

15 run · 4 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measured

Readability & contrast1 flagged

Text contrast (WCAG AA) needs workcontrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

57% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

worst: “the rest is on us” at 2.13:1 (12px, #f5895a on #f4efe7). needs 4.5:1

fix Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Mobile & tap targetsclear

Mobile viewport passesmobile:mobile-viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Typography1 flagged

Body text size needs worktype:body-text-size

Smallest body text is 11px (base ~19px). below the ~16px readable floor.

fix Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Line length notetype:line-length

10 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

fix Cap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

Accessibility hygiene1 flagged

Weight & delivery1 flagged

Page weight not measurableweight:page-weight

At least 0.1 MB across 9 measurable resources, but 13 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Render-blocking resources passesweight:render-blocking-resources

2 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

fix Defer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.

Oversized images needs workweight:oversized-images

6 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“dark-mode.png” is 2206px wide, displayed at 150px

fix Serve responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.