mole.cheap
Beats 6%.
of 349 entry-page SaaS funnels. It runs 1 of 11 selling tactics. 5 of 12 UX checks pass.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Across all 691 entry-page captures: beats 20%.
Peer rank
Beats 6%.
of 349 entry-page SaaS funnels. Across all 691 entry-page captures: beats 20%.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Clear Mac caches with MOLE. More room for your Mac.”
- Sign in
- Explore MOLE for Mac
- See how it works
- Overview
- Cache review
- License
- Get MOLE — $15 ↗
- Download
How it’s built
12 UX checks · 3 need work · 5 pass · 4 notes · 0 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
93% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Tap-target size (mobile)
27 of 36 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
See all 12 checks
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line length
4 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 4 content images carry alt text.
Label in name
1 control has an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
Page weight
At least 0.7 MB across 38 measurable resources. 1 cross-origin resource did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.
Render-blocking resources
2 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Oversized images
3 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Keyboard reachability
16 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.
How it looks
-apple-system for headlines and text. 6 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
1 of 11 selling tactic found: FAQ / objection handling. 10 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 10 it lacks
- Demo / docs entry34% of funnels have it (620 of 1,837).
- Lead-capture form26% of funnels have it (476 of 1,837).
- Proof above the fold16% of funnels have it (426 of 2,651).
- Trusted-by logo wall72% of funnels have it (1,621 of 2,257).
- Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (306 of 2,257).
- Press / "as seen in"24% of funnels have it (634 of 2,648).
- Us-vs-them comparison19% of funnels have it (506 of 2,651).
- Free trial / freemium78% of SaaS funnels have it (1,427 of 1,828).
- Pricing tiers51% of SaaS funnels have it (925 of 1,828).
- Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (138 of 2,648).
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour and size
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 1 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Free trial / freemium · who has it
Trusted-by logo wall · who has it
Pricing tiers · who has it
Demo / docs entry · who has it
Lead-capture form · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 8 on the first page
Prices seen · 1
Plus
Colours and type, in full.
Every colour and size we measured.
Colours · 6 measured, with their share
Type · -apple-system, 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Compare
Put your site next to mole.cheap.
Every number, side by side.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.