Site report · Content · Scanned 2026-10-26

neuportal.ai

0 of 7.

selling tactics found. 20 of 26 UX checks pass.

neuportal.ai desktop capture of the first page

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Fewer than 1% of the 690 entry-page captures we have measured showed fewer conversion tactics than we found here.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“We built an AI that trades real markets.”

  • Join the community
  • Join the list
  • Watch live on Telegram

How it’s built

26 UX checks · 2 need work · 20 pass · 2 notes · 2 not measured

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

30 of 36 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

See all 26 checks
Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

99% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.6×.

Note

Line length

4 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 1 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Form labels

All 3 form fields carry a label.

Pass

Named controls

Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Heading levels

No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (50 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Skip link

A same-page “skip to content” link was found.

Note

Label in name

1 control has an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 3.5 MB across 15 measurable resources, but 8 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

2 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Pass

Oversized images

No image is shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Pass

Landmark regions

The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Pass

Input types

No email or phone field uses type="text".

Pass

Autocomplete hints

2 of 3 fields carry an autocomplete attribute.

Pass

Inline validation

2 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).

How it looks

Inter for headlines and text. 8 colours measured.

How it sells

What Plus adds.

No selling tactics found. 7 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which 7 it lacks
    • Proof above the fold16% of funnels have it (430 of 2,675).
    • Trusted-by logo wall72% of funnels have it (1,634 of 2,284).
    • Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (312 of 2,284).
    • Press / "as seen in"24% of funnels have it (628 of 2,672).
    • Us-vs-them comparison19% of funnels have it (510 of 2,675).
    • FAQ / objection handling68% of funnels have it (1,809 of 2,675).
    • Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (138 of 2,672).

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour and size

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 0 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Trusted-by logo wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 3 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colours and type, in full.

Every colour and size we measured.

Colours · 8 measured, with their share

Plus · $29/mo

Type · Inter, 10 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Get Plus · $29/moOpening soon.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.33.0 on 2026-10-26, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 5 links seen, 1 walkable, and 0 matched a funnel step. If this funnel continues past the entry page, we did not reach it — everything below is measured from the entry page alone.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Compare

Put your site next to neuportal.ai.

Every number, side by side.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.