onbrandads.com
Beats 48%.
of 1,539 multi-step SaaS funnels. It runs 5 of 11 selling tactics. 12 of 26 UX checks pass.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Across all 2,027 multi-step funnels: beats 56%.
Peer rank
Beats 48%.
of 1,539 multi-step SaaS funnels. Across all 2,027 multi-step funnels: beats 56%.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“AI Ad Generator — On-Brand Ads From Your Website”
- Toggle mode
- Log in
- Sign up
- Read my website
- Feed 1:1
- Portrait 4:5
- Story 9:16
- Landscape 16:9
How it’s built
26 UX checks · 7 need work · 12 pass · 5 notes · 2 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
50% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 1+ runs fail. 83% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 8px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Named controls
21 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
See all 26 checks
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.43×.
Line length
8 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 92 content images carry alt text.
Form labels
1 form field relies on placeholder text as the only label.
Link text
No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Heading levels
No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (59 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Skip link
No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
Label in name
7 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Page weight
At least 4.7 MB across 106 measurable resources, but 109 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Render-blocking resources
10 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Oversized images
67 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
Landmark regions
No <main> or <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
Keyboard reachability
No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.
Input types
No email or phone field uses type="text".
Autocomplete hints
No autocomplete attributes across 5 fields. browsers cannot autofill.
Inline validation
2 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).
Tap-target size (mobile)
83 of 114 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
How it looks
Avenir Next for headlines, ui-sans-serif for text. 7 colours measured.
Worth borrowing
Lead-capture form: 26% of funnels have it (488 of 1884). This site does.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
5 of 11 selling tactics found: Lead-capture form, Pricing tiers, FAQ / objection handling, Trusted-by logo wall, Free trial / freemium. 6 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 6 it lacks
- Demo / docs entry33% of funnels have it (630 of 1,884).
- Proof above the fold16% of funnels have it (438 of 2,714).
- Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (317 of 2,333).
- Press / "as seen in"22% of funnels have it (601 of 2,711).
- Us-vs-them comparison19% of funnels have it (521 of 2,714).
- Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (136 of 2,711).
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour and size
Lead-capture form · the evidence
Pricing tiers · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 5 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Lead-capture form · the evidence
Pricing tiers · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Demo / docs entry · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 9 on the first page
Prices seen · 6
Plus
Colours and type, in full.
Every colour and size we measured.
Colours · 7 measured, with their share
Type · Avenir Next, 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Compare
Put your site next to onbrandads.com.
Every number, side by side.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.