openmonth.app

Beats 23%.

of 339 entry-page SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

openmonth.app desktop capture of the first page
Scanned 2026-10-31SaaS

What it skips

openmonth.app misses 1 thing most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 23%.

of 339 entry-page SaaS funnels.

beats 23% of 339 entry-page SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“The calendar you can actually write on.”

  • Download OpenMonth Free
  • Buy OpenMonth — $24.99
  • Dark
  • Light

How it’s built

22 UX checks · 17 pass · 1 needs work · 2 notes · 2 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

99% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 13px; first paragraph 20px.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.55×.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 5 content images carry alt text.

Show the other 16 checks
Pass

Named controls

Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Heading levels

No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (43 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Skip link

A same-page “skip to content” link was found.

Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

1 stylesheet/script in <head> block first paint.

Pass

Landmark regions

The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Note

Line length

2 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Oversized images

2 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

9 of 15 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 0.3 MB across 8 measurable resources, but 2 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Seen on the page

The sections of openmonth.app where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • FAQ / objection handling1 crop
    • openmonth.app FAQ section, Homepage / Lander
      FAQ · Homepage / Lander

How it looks

Inter for headlines and text. 6 colours measured.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

2 of 11 selling tactics found: Free trial / freemium, FAQ / objection handling. 9 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 9 it lacks
    • Trusted-by logo wall60% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. openmonth.app doesn't. Gap
    • Pricing tiersOnly 22% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Demo / docs entryOnly 18% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 17% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 10% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Lead-capture formOnly 10% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 9% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 8% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 3% of 339 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 2 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Trusted-by logo wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 4 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 1

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 6 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 12 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.34.0 on 2026-10-31, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 6 links seen on the entry page, and none were walkable past it. We only follow a[href], so a funnel behind a button or a login would not appear here.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · openmonth.app · Compare

← Back to the openmonth.app report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to openmonth.app?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

openmonth.app

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.