saas · Oct 3, 2026

rankresume.io

We found more conversion tactics here than on 22% of the 1,334 multi-step SaaS funnels we have measured.

4 conversion tactics detected

3 pages walked · measured by Roentgen 1.28.1

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel
How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.28.1 on 2026-10-03. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

Against all 1,754 multi-step funnels, more conversion tactics than 34% of them.

Walk 46 links on the entry page, 35 walkable. 2 matched a funnel step; we captured 3 pages in all, this one included.

The short version, in 5 parts

  1. Proven on the page

    4 conversion tactics detected, each backed by text on the page

    Compares itself against alternatives
    comparison grid: 9 rows
    Answers buyer objections
    FAQ
    Offers a free trial or free tier
    Try free

    + 1 more with evidence

    See all 4

  2. Not seen

    7 of 11 applicable tactics we checked for and did not see

    Trusted-by logo wall
    Customer/company logos or a "trusted by / used by" claim.
    Press / "as seen in"
    Media logos or an "as seen in / featured in" claim borrowing publication credib…
    Demo / docs entry
    A "book a demo" or documentation / API entry point.

    + 4 more

    See what we looked for

  3. Flagged

    2 of 10 build checks flagged, each with a fix

    Body text size
    Smallest sampled text is 12px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
    Tap-target size (mobile)
    53 of 97 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

    See the fixes

  4. Walked

    3 pages walked, Vs to Aiapply

    Step 1
    Vs
    Step 2
    Resume Io
    Step 3
    Aiapply

    Walk it frame by frame

  5. In their words

    The headline: Compare RankResume

    Promise
    Compare RankResume with Resume.io, AIApply, Jobscan, Resume Worded, and more. ATS tailoring, pricing, and wor…

    Read every quote

Captured Vs
Step 1 · Vs1 / 3

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

3 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Vs
01

Vs

▼ thinnest
0 tactics

no named tactics detected on this step

Resume Io
02

Resume Io

▲ strongest
4 tactics

$2.95 +7 more  ·  subscription

ComparisonFAQFree trialPricing tiers
Aiapply
03

Aiapply

4 tactics

$19.95 +7 more  ·  subscription · 3 months

ComparisonFAQFree trialPricing tiers

In their own words

5 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
Page title
RankResume vs Other Resume Tools — Honest Comparisons
Meta description
Compare RankResume with Resume.io, AIApply, Jobscan, Resume Worded, and more. ATS tailoring, pricing, and workflow plus links to try our free ATS score…
Headline
Compare RankResume
Section headings
Apply faster with the Chrome extension
Buttons and links
Contact Us

What we found

4 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

objection2 of 2

Compares itself against alternatives comparison grid: 9 rows
Answers buyer objections FAQ

offer2 of 2

Offers a free trial or free tier Try free
Makes the pricing ladder explicit free, $24.95mo, $24.95/mo, $19.95/mo

What we didn’t find

7 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

What we didn’t see7 of 11 applicable

Trusted-by logo wall 1,466 of the 2,021 funnels we checked
Press / "as seen in" 631 of the 2,388 funnels we checked
Demo / docs entry 572 of the 1,668 funnels we checked
Lead-capture form 435 of the 1,668 funnels we checked
Proof above the fold 374 of the 2,391 funnels we checked
Usage / adoption proof 285 of the 2,021 funnels we checked
Scarcity / urgency copy 122 of the 2,388 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

10 run · 2 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

2 of 9 measured checks need work1 could not be measured — not counted either way

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest sampled text is 12px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

53 of 97 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Free alternative” at 94×14px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing2

Line length

34 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length
Heading levels

1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

FixStep heading levels one at a time; use CSS for size, not a deeper level.

a11y:heading-levels

Not measurable1

Page weight

At least 0.4 MB across 120 measurable resources, but 42 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

weight:page-weight

Clear5

Text contrast (WCAG AA) · Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text · Render-blocking resources

Playbook match

1 matched

which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

deriveda deterministic summary generated only from measured facts. labeled, never an LLM guess

Comparison surface matches the Intent-Match pattern — measured comparison table plus comparison-intent copy

comparison table p2: comparison grid: 9 rowscomparison copy RankResume vs Other Resume Tools &mdash; Honest Comparisons

A match means this funnel's measurable surfaces fit the playbook's pattern — the quoted language is what fired the detection. A lever is one playbook mechanism observed on-page. We never claim what a brand's ads or emails do; a crawl can't see them. All funnel designs →

Two different things sit side by side here. The claim and its quoted evidence are measured on this funnel, the same way every other fact on this page is. The playbook itself is written guidance — our strategy library, not a measurement of this site — and it lives behind the links above. Nothing on this page recommends what this brand should do.

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#1e3a8a
accent#1e3a8a
bg#fef2e8
surface#ffffff
text#ffffff
See the roles applied
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox48px
Jumps over the lazy dog20px
A subheading in their voice18px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three
Type scale, weights & families
SIZE SCALE
14pxAa
16pxAa
18pxAa
20pxAa
48pxAa
WEIGHTS
Aa400
Aa500
Aa600
Aa700
Aa900
FAMILIES
__GeistSans_3a0388
rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

2 of 9 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measuredextracted directly from the live page. a fact, not an opinion

Sections — structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

Elements — the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

We ran these passes on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

Similar crawls