Above-the-fold capture of spec24.dev
their above-the-fold, as captured

UXXRAY · Teardown dossier ◉ scanned Jul 24, 2026

spec24.dev

saas · desktop · Roentgen 1.7

Biggest quick win

7% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 24% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way. Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

6 of 11 conversion signals detected

70 /100 coverage

Partial ★★★☆☆ weighted for impact · 5 measured categories

UXXRAY scans for 11 conversion tactics with deterministic rules. Unconventional builds may not register, so this is detection coverage, not a verdict. Scored by Roentgen 1.7; detection improves, so rescan anytime.

Score breakdown

  • Offer clarity 0/8
  • Action path 17/20
  • Trust & proof 6/11
  • Friction reduction 10/10
  • Value reinforcement 7/10

The funnel, frame by frame

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by stepmeasured
Homepage / Lander
01

Homepage / Lander

5 tactics

€0 +4 more

Sticky CTASubscriptionFree trialNo cardDemo / docs
Pricing
02

Pricing

▲ strongest
8 tactics

€29 +12 more

Sticky CTAComparisonSubscriptionFAQFree trialNo cardLogo wallDemo / docs
Sign Up
03

Sign Up

▼ thinnest
0 tactics

no named tactics detected on this step

Offer

how clearly they present the deal and its valuemeasured
0/8nonepoints earned

No signals detected for this category on the captured funnel.

Tactics we scan for but didn't detect

Add them to lift coverage, or tell us we missed one.

  • pricing tiers

Action

the path to convert. CTA, sign-up, checkoutmeasured
17/20highpoints earned
  • Free trial / freemiumFree plan
  • Lead-capture form
  • Demo / docs entry

Tactics we scan for but didn't detect

Add them to lift coverage, or tell us we missed one.

  • proof above the fold

Trust

proof, social proof, and credibilitymeasured
6/11partialpoints earned
  • Trusted-by logo walllogo wall (4 distinct marks)

Tactics we scan for but didn't detect

Add them to lift coverage, or tell us we missed one.

  • usage / adoption proof

Friction

objections answered, barriers removedmeasured
10/10highpoints earned
  • FAQ / objection handling
  • Free trial / freemiumFree plan

Value

why it’s worth it. comparison and reinforcementmeasured
7/10highpoints earned
  • Us-vs-them comparisoncomparison grid: 10 rows

Tactics we scan for but didn't detect

Add them to lift coverage, or tell us we missed one.

  • usage / adoption proof

UX signals

measured UX quality. contrast · mobile · type · a11y · layoutmeasured
Minor
2 flags · 7 checks

Measured UX quality. flags, not opinions. Deterministic, evidence-backed, and kept separate from the conversion score.

Readability & contrast

WCAG AA on measurable text. worst offenders quoted, never a fail we can’t compute.
NEEDS WORKText contrast (WCAG AA)

7% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 24% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

worst: “Automatically.” at 2.95:1 (60px, #d97757 on #faf9f0). needs 3:1

Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Mobile & tap targets

Responsive viewport + touch-target sizes where it matters.
GOODMobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Typography

Body size, line-height, line length. is the pitch actually readable?
NEEDS WORKBody text size

Smallest body text is 9px (base ~20px). below the ~16px readable floor.

Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

NOTELine length

21 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Cap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

Accessibility hygiene

Language, alt text, form labels, named controls, headings, link clarity.
GOODLanguage declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

GOODImage alt text

All 9 content images carry alt text.

NOTELink text

3 links use generic text (“click here” / “learn more”).

Make link text describe its destination out of context.

Next move

Now line it up against a competitor.

Paste any URL. We’ll run the same scan, the same rubric, and put the two funnels side by side. category by category, all measured.

Live scan · 15-25 sec · same rubric · nothing is guessed

Brand kit

palette by on-page usage · type rendered livemeasured
full palette ordered by on-page usage %
primary#fef5f2
accent#fef5f2
bg#ffffff
surface#faf9f0
text#d97757
accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job
The quick brown fox60px
Jumps over the lazy dog48px
A subheading in their voice30px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

  • List item one, at body scale
  • List item two
  • List item three

Teardown report. copy for your LLM

the full evidence-based read: what this funnel does well, where it is thin, and the on-page proof for each. paste into any agent to learn from
spec24.dev · 6/11 tactics · 0 proof templates · evidence-backed
# Agent Brief. build in the style of spec24.dev

> Machine-extracted from a live on-demand funnel teardown (2026-07-24). 100% facts —
> measured tokens, detected patterns, harvested proof strings. No LLM interpretation.
> Single-page capture (MVP): homepage/landing page only, no funnel walk.
> Tokens: `tokens.json` / `tailwind.css`.

**Category (label):** —
**Funnel:** Homepage / Lander → Pricing → Sign Up

## Palette (area-weighted from live CSS)
| Hex | Usage | Likely role |
|-----|------:|-------------|
| `#ffffff` | 55.1% | background |
| `#faf9f0` | 36.8% | background |
| `#fef5f2` | 3.7% | background |
| `#000000` | 2.9% | support |
| `#d97757` | 0.8% | accent/brand |
| `#f5f4eb` | 0.4% | background |
| `#fdeae2` | 0.1% | background |
| `#e8e6d8` | 0.1% | background |

Curated roles: `primary=#fef5f2` · `accent=#fef5f2` · `bg=#ffffff` · `surface=#faf9f0` · `text=#d97757`

## Type
- Display: `DM Sans`
- Body: `Manrope`
- Size scale (px): 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 30, 48, 60
- Radius (px): 4, 10, 12, 16, 20, 33554400

## Patterns detected (fact-based). 6/11
- **Us-vs-them comparison**. A comparison table framing the brand against alternatives. _(pricing: comparison grid: 10 rows)_
- **FAQ / objection handling**. An accordion / FAQ block answering objections. _(pricing: Frequently asked questions)_
- **Free trial / freemium**. A free trial, free tier, or "no credit card" entry offer. _(home: Free plan; pricing: Free plan)_
- **Trusted-by logo wall**. Customer/company logos or a "trusted by / used by" claim. _(pricing: logo wall (4 distinct marks))_
- **Demo / docs entry**. A "book a demo" or documentation / API entry point. _(home: Book a Demo; pricing: Book a Demo)_
- **Lead-capture form**. An on-page form collecting contact details (email / name / phone) outside a checkout. _(signup: text, email, password, password)_

## Proof language (harvested strings → templates)
- _(none extracted)_

## Funnel facts
- Depth reached: 3 step(s) (single-page MVP capture)
- Proof points: 0 across 0 step(s)
- Discount/anchor pricing: yes · Countdown: no · Subscription: no

## To replicate
Match the palette + type tokens above and deploy the detected patterns. This is a single-page capture. no cart/checkout tactics were evaluated.