spec24.dev
Beats 47%.
of 1,522 multi-step SaaS funnels. It runs 5 of 11 selling tactics. 13 of 26 UX checks pass.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Across all 2,007 multi-step funnels: beats 56%.
Peer rank
Beats 47%.
of 1,522 multi-step SaaS funnels. Across all 2,007 multi-step funnels: beats 56%.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Your clients send chaos. Your board gets clarity. Automatically.”
- Light
- Dark
- System
- Book a Demo
- Start Free
- See the Dual Interface
- Client View
- Agency View
How it’s built
26 UX checks · 6 need work · 13 pass · 5 notes · 2 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
13% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 9px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Render-blocking resources
22 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
See all 26 checks
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.4×.
Line length
21 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 8 content images carry alt text.
Form labels
All 4 form fields carry a label.
Named controls
Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.
Link text
No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Heading levels
2 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (57 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Skip link
No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
Label in name
4 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Page weight
At least 1.9 MB across 151 measurable resources, but 68 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Oversized images
5 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
Landmark regions
No <main> or <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
Keyboard reachability
No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.
Input types
No email or phone field uses type="text".
Autocomplete hints
No autocomplete attributes across 3 fields. browsers cannot autofill.
Inline validation
3 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).
Tap-target size (mobile)
89 of 141 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
How it looks
DM Sans for headlines, Manrope for text. 8 colours measured.
Worth borrowing
Us-vs-them comparison: 19% of funnels have it (515 of 2694). This site does.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
5 of 11 selling tactics found: Us-vs-them comparison, Lead-capture form, Demo / docs entry, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 6 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 6 it lacks
- Proof above the fold16% of funnels have it (435 of 2,694).
- Trusted-by logo wall72% of funnels have it (1,655 of 2,308).
- Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (315 of 2,308).
- Press / "as seen in"23% of funnels have it (627 of 2,691).
- Pricing tiers51% of SaaS funnels have it (943 of 1,863).
- Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (137 of 2,691).
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour and size
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Lead-capture form · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 5 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Lead-capture form · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Trusted-by logo wall · who has it
Pricing tiers · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 12 on the first page
Prices seen · 13
Plus
Colours and type, in full.
Every colour and size we measured.
Colours · 8 measured, with their share
Type · DM Sans, 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Compare
Put your site next to spec24.dev.
Every number, side by side.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.