saas · Sep 12, 2026

treeova.com

We found more conversion tactics here than on 23% of the 1,350 multi-step SaaS funnels we have measured.

4 conversion tactics detected

3 pages walked · measured by Roentgen 1.27.0

4 conversion tactics detected
3 pages captured
11 UX checks
2 flagged

Put this x-ray to work Brief your AI X-ray your funnel

How this was measured

Measured by Roentgen 1.27.0 on 2026-09-12. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

This is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel. A low count means we did not detect those patterns, not that the funnel is weak.

Against all 1,781 multi-step funnels, more conversion tactics than 34% of them.

Walk 41 links on the entry page, 28 walkable. 2 matched a funnel step; we captured 3 pages in all, this one included.

The short version, in 5 parts

Proven on the page
4 conversion tactics detected, each backed by text on the page

Answers buyer objections
What is MetaChart and how does it differ from TradingView?
Offers a free trial or free tier
Start Free
Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim
logo wall (17 distinct marks)

+ 1 more with evidence

See all 4
Not seen
7 of 11 applicable tactics we checked for and did not see

Press / "as seen in"
Media logos or an "as seen in / featured in" claim borrowing publication credib…
Demo / docs entry
A "book a demo" or documentation / API entry point.
Us-vs-them comparison
A comparison table framing the brand against alternatives.

+ 4 more

See what we looked for
Flagged
3 of 12 build checks flagged, each with a fix

Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Oversized images
25 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Tap-target size (mobile)
76 of 90 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

See the fixes
Walked
3 pages walked, Homepage / Lander to Pricing

Step 1
Homepage / Lander
Step 2
Features
Step 3
Pricing

Walk it frame by frame
In their words
The headline: Agentic AI Trading Platform for Options, Stocks and Futures. Autonomous AI Agen…

Promise
AI trading agents that research, plan, and execute options, stock, and futures strategies through your own br…
Prices shown
$100

Read every quote

Scan

Captured Homepage / Lander — Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 3

What we recorded

Progress

2 scans

this funnel’s coverage score across measured re-scans

measured

Unchanged across 2 scans Same 4 conversion tactics detected since 2026-08-09.

4 tactics 2026-08-09
→
4 tactics 2026-09-12

The funnel, frame by frame

3 steps walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measured

Homepage / Lander

4 tactics

$100

Trust badgesFree trialNo cardLogo wall

Features

▼ thinnest

2 tactics

FAQLogo wall

Pricing

▲ strongest

6 tactics

$30 +4 more · subscription

SubscriptionFAQTrust badgesFree trialNo cardPricing tiers

In their own words

30 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measured

Page title: Agentic AI Trading Platform for Options, Stocks & Futures — Treeova
Meta description: AI trading agents that research, plan, and execute options, stock, and futures strategies through your own broker. No code. Free funded paper trading.
Headline: Agentic AI Trading Platform for Options, Stocks and Futures. Autonomous AI Agents — Options, Stocks & Futures
Section headings: An agentic AI execution layer for your brokerOptions, stock equities, and futuresYour broker executes. Treeova thinks ahead.How AI trading agents run your strategy through your own brokerStop juggling scattered tools. Trade from one AI workspace.Built for traders ready to work smarter.Common questions about agentic AI tradingReady to trade from one AI workspace?+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links: TreeovaSign InStart Free TodayWatch DemoEXPLOREPlatformResourcesCompanyLegallegal documents
Prices on the page: $100

Sections

2 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measured

Hero section of treeova.com — **Hero**0% down the page

Footer section of treeova.com — **Footer**83% down the page

Elements

2 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measured

No credit card element — **No credit card**“No Credit Card Required”

What we found

4 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measured

objection1 of 2

Answers buyer objections What is MetaChart and how does it differ from TradingView?

proof1 of 4

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim logo wall (17 distinct marks)

offer2 of 2

Offers a free trial or free tier Start Free

Makes the pricing ladder explicit free, $30/mo, $75/mo, $35/mo

What we didn’t find

7 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measured

What we didn’t see7 of 11 applicable

Press / "as seen in" 642 of the 2,417 funnels we checked

Demo / docs entry 575 of the 1,683 funnels we checked

Us-vs-them comparison 441 of the 2,420 funnels we checked

Lead-capture form 437 of the 1,683 funnels we checked

Proof above the fold 381 of the 2,420 funnels we checked

Usage / adoption proof 289 of the 2,043 funnels we checked

Scarcity / urgency copy 125 of the 2,417 funnels we checked

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

12 run · 3 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measured

3 of 11 measured checks need work1 could not be measured — not counted either way

Body text size

type:body-text-size

Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

FixKeep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Oversized images

weight:oversized-images

25 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“metachart-cockpit.png” is 1920px wide, displayed at 482px

FixServe responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.

Tap-target size (mobile)

mobile:tap-target-size-mobile

76 of 90 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

smallest: “Home” at 38×16px

FixGive tappable controls a ≥44×44px hit area. the touch minimum.

Worth knowing3

Line length

38 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

FixCap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

type:line-length

Landmark regions

No <header> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

FixWrap the page in <header>, <main> and <footer> (or matching ARIA roles).

structure:landmark-regions

Not measurable1

Page weight

At least 3.4 MB across 50 measurable resources, but 59 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

weight:page-weight

Clear5

Text contrast (WCAG AA) · Mobile viewport · Language declared · Image alt text · Render-blocking resources

Brand kit

5 colour roles

palette by on-page usage · type rendered live

measured

full palette ordered by on-page usage %

accent#0e131b

bg#0e131b

surface#0e131b

text#a6a6a6

See the roles applied

accent

Body copy in their text role, on a surface card.

the roles, doing their job

The quick brown fox72px

Jumps over the lazy dog60px

A subheading in their voice48px

Body copy set at their measured paragraph size. This is how their product reads to a first-time visitor. same family, same scale, same weight.

List item one, at body scale
List item two
List item three

Type scale, weights & families

SIZE SCALE

10pxAa

11pxAa

12pxAa

14pxAa

16pxAa

18pxAa

20pxAa

36pxAa

48pxAa

60pxAa

72pxAa

WEIGHTS

Aa400

Aa500

Aa600

Aa700

Aa900

FAMILIES

Montserrat · Roboto

rendered in their own type system · webfont not loaded. system fallback if uninstalled

Measured, found none

1 of 10 layers

layers we ran on this funnel that came back empty

measured

Playbook match — which funnel play this page runs — measured, evidence-quoted

We ran this pass on the pages we captured and found nothing to show. That is a measurement of this funnel, not a recommendation — and it is a different statement from a layer we never ran, which does not appear here at all.

Machine version → JSON bundle Markdown brief Design tokens llms.txt