clicks.page
Beats 71%.
of 1,612 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.
What sets it apart
clicks.page does 3 things few peers do.
Each one is run by under 30% of 1,608 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.
-
Usage / adoption proof
Rarity
Only 16%.
of 1,608 SaaS funnels have usage / adoption proof. This site is one of them.
16 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 84 wait outside.
261 of 1608 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where clicks.page does it · Homepage / Lander: “100 websites” FOUND. Only 16% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. clicks.page does. 261 of 1608 SaaS funnels.
-
Proof above the fold
Rarity
Only 19%.
of 1,608 SaaS funnels have proof above the fold. This site is one of them.
19 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 81 wait outside.
301 of 1608 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where clicks.page does it · Homepage / Lander: “★★★★★” FOUND. Only 19% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. clicks.page does. 301 of 1608 SaaS funnels.
Examples of this
Crops from this site 1
Hero · Homepage / Lander
-
Lead-capture form
Rarity
Only 29%.
of 1,608 SaaS funnels have lead-capture form. This site is one of them.
29 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 71 wait outside.
463 of 1608 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. Where clicks.page does it · Homepage / Lander: “email, email” FOUND. Only 29% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. clicks.page does. 463 of 1608 SaaS funnels.
Examples of this
What it skips
clicks.page misses 1 thing most peers do.
Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.
Trusted-by logo wallMISSING79% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. clicks.page doesn't. · 1268 of 1608
Demo / docs entryOpportunity36% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. · 578 of 1608
Us-vs-them comparisonOpportunityOnly 28% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. · 456 of 1608
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 23% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. · 366 of 1608
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 5% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. · 88 of 1608
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 71%.
of 1,612 multi-step SaaS funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Beautiful analytics. Revenue first.”
- Start tracking
- Copy setup prompt
- Monthly
- Yearly
- Start free ›
How it’s built
25 UX checks · 11 pass · 6 need work · 6 notes · 2 not measured
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.5×.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 1 content images carry alt text.
Link text
No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Show the other 19 checks
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (69 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Input types
No email or phone field uses type="text".
Autocomplete hints
4 of 4 fields carry an autocomplete attribute.
Inline validation
4 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).
Line length
3 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Heading levels
3 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.
Skip link
No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
Label in name
8 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
Render-blocking resources
4 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Keyboard reachability
314 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
68% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 20% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Form labels
3 of 11 form fields have no label.
Named controls
1 button/link has no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Oversized images
32 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Landmark regions
No <main> or <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
Page weight
At least 0.3 MB across 39 measurable resources, but 30 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
Seen on the page
The sections of clicks.page where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.
Proof above the fold1 crop
Hero · Homepage / Lander
How it looks
Inter Tight for headlines, Inter for text. 10 colours measured.
Worth borrowing
Usage / adoption proof: Only 16% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. clicks.page does.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
6 of 11 selling tactics found: Usage / adoption proof, Proof above the fold, Lead-capture form, Pricing tiers, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 5 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 5 it lacks
- Trusted-by logo wall79% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. clicks.page doesn't. Gap
- Demo / docs entry36% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 28% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,608 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
Usage / adoption proof · the evidence
Proof above the fold · the evidence
Lead-capture form · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 6 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Usage / adoption proof · the evidence
Proof above the fold · the evidence
Lead-capture form · the evidence
Pricing tiers · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Trusted-by logo wall · who has it
Demo / docs entry · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 5 on the first page
Prices seen · 62
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 10 colours measured
Type scale · 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · clicks.page · Compare
← Back to the clicks.page reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to clicks.page?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
clicks.page
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.