clockjumper.com
Beats 4%.
of 2,108 multi-step funnels we’ve measured.
What it skips
clockjumper.com misses 1 thing most peers do.
Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.
Trusted-by logo wallMISSING53% of 130 content funnels do this. clockjumper.com doesn't. · 69 of 130
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 13% of 165 content funnels do this. · 21 of 165
Examples of this
- bunny.directoryFREE TO LAUNCH ★ PERMANENT LISTINGS ★ LIVE ON APPROVAL ★
- adhdprivate.co.uk★ 5.0 6 out of 5 from 6 reviews
- jubilq.com★ SPOTLIGHT Trending & Featured View all
- submityourstartup.nowPublished 24 Oct 2026 · Last reviewed 24 Oct 2026
- prodent.im95.4k+ Reviews
- gcscheats.com★★★★★ ★★★★★ 4.8/5 from 7,000+ players · , 40 games
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 11% of 165 content funnels do this. · 18 of 165
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 8% of 130 content funnels do this. · 11 of 130
Us-vs-them comparisonOpportunityOnly 7% of 165 content funnels do this. · 12 of 165
Examples of this
- adhdprivate.co.ukcomparison grid: 24 rows
- submityourstartup.nowcomparison table: SITE · AUDIENCE · FREE OPTION? · PRICING, AS SHOWN ON SITE · H
- gcscheats.comcomparison grid: 16 rows
- clipturn.appcomparison table: Capability · ClipTurn FixQuotes · Clipchamp Microsoft · Lossle
- vibeboot.devcomparison grid: 25 rows
- tienrank.comcomparison table: CATEGORÍA · PRODUCTOS · PRECIO · PARA QUIÉN · DIFERENCIAL
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 2% of 165 content funnels do this. · 4 of 165
Examples of this
Captures of this
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Peer rank
Beats 4%.
of 2,108 multi-step funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Time zone conversions”
How it’s built
10 UX checks · 4 pass · 2 need work · 3 notes · 1 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
99% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Render-blocking resources
1 stylesheet/script in <head> block first paint.
Line length
11 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Skip link
No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
Show the other 4 checks
Label in name
7 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Tap-target size (mobile)
42 of 78 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
Page weight
At least 0.8 MB across 51 measurable resources, but 69 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Seen on the page
The sections of clockjumper.com where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.
FAQ / objection handling2 crops
FAQ · Abu Dhabi To Ist 
FAQ · Abu Dhabi To Pht
How it looks
Archivo for headlines, IBM Plex Mono for text. 2 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
1 of 7 selling tactic found: FAQ / objection handling. 6 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 6 it lacks
- Trusted-by logo wall53% of 130 content funnels do this. clockjumper.com doesn't. Gap
- Proof above the foldOnly 13% of 165 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Press / "as seen in"Only 11% of 165 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 8% of 130 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 7% of 165 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 2% of 165 content funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 1 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Trusted-by logo wall · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 2 colours measured
Type scale · 6 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · clockjumper.com · Compare
← Back to the clockjumper.com reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to clockjumper.com?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
clockjumper.com
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.