Owner view · fuck.it

fuck.it

Beats 11%.

You beat 11%.

of 2,200 multi-step funnels we’ve measured.

fuck.it desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Something wrong?

Scanned 2026-11-04Content

Below the fold

Section by section.

Each part of the page, with our check beside it.

  1. fuck.it Hero section
    Hero · their words: “[@FUCK.IT] - EMAIL WITH ATTITUDE”
    Hero · 0% to 9% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 13 buttons and links, “ACCESS BY INVITE” and “[REDEEM CODE]”, a form, 42 words. Absent, not scored 0.

  2. fuck.it Features section
    Features · their words: “REDEEM INVITE CODE”
    Features · 9% to 18% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 3 buttons and links, “REPUTATION PAGE” and “[CONTINUE]”, a form, 150 words. Absent, not scored 0.

  3. fuck.it Content section
    Content · their words: “EMAIL PLANS”
    Content · 18% to 40% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 6 buttons and links, “[CHOOSE CORE]” and “HERE”, a form, 367 words. Absent, not scored 0.

  4. fuck.it FAQ section
    FAQ · their words: “FAQ”
    FAQ · 59% to 81% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 6 buttons and links, “OPEN-XCHANGE (OX)” and “REQUEST AN INVITE”, 531 words. Absent, not scored 0.

  5. fuck.it Content section
    Content · their words: “ABOUT”
    Content · 81% to 90% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 204 words. Absent, not scored 0.

Sections of Homepage / Lander. Crops are portions of the page, shown beside our analysis. Measured by Roentgen 1.35.1 on 2026-11-04. A section with nothing detected is absent, never scored 0.

Something wrong?

What it skips

Nothing most peers do is missing.

5 tactics fuck.it could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Peer rank

Beats 11%.

of 2,200 multi-step funnels.

beats 11% of 2200 multi-step funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“[@FUCK.IT] - EMAIL WITH ATTITUDE”

  • Show password
  • [LOGIN] [FORGOT PASSWORD]
  • [LOGIN]
  • [CONTINUE]
  • [CHOOSE CORE]
  • [CHOOSE EDGE]
  • [CHOOSE APEX]

How it’s built

26 UX checks · 14 pass · 2 need work · 7 notes · 3 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

96% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 15px; first paragraph 20px.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 14 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Form labels

All 5 form fields carry a label.

Show the other 20 checks
Pass

Named controls

Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (58 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Skip link

A same-page “skip to content” link was found.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Pass

Input types

No email or phone field uses type="text".

Pass

Autocomplete hints

3 of 3 fields carry an autocomplete attribute.

Note

Line length

38 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Link text

3 links use generic text (“click here” / “learn more”).

Note

Heading levels

2 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Note

Label in name

4 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

Note

Render-blocking resources

7 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Note

Oversized images

3 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Note

Landmark regions

No <header> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Needs work

Line height

Body line-height is 1.25×, tight enough to hurt readability.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

102 of 109 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 0.9 MB across 25 measurable resources, but 27 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Not checked

Inline validation

No validation attributes were found in the DOM. Script-driven validation is invisible to this check, so absence is not a failure.

Seen on the page

The sections of fuck.it where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • FAQ / objection handling1 crop
    • fuck.it FAQ section, Homepage / Lander
      FAQ · Homepage / Lander

How it looks

JetBrains Mono for headlines and text. 9 colours measured.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

2 of 7 selling tactics found: FAQ / objection handling, Trusted-by logo wall. 5 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 5 it lacks
    • Proof above the foldOnly 13% of 174 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 11% of 174 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 10% of 141 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 7% of 174 content funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 2% of 174 content funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 2 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 7 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 9 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 8 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

UXXRAY+

The owner view is for members.

$29/mo. Your rank, your close matches and your fix list, in your own words.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.35.1 on 2026-11-04, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 41 links on the entry page, 22 walkable. 1 matched a funnel step; we captured 2 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · fuck.it · Compare

← Back to the fuck.it report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to fuck.it?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

fuck.it

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.