namecombinerss.us
Beats 38%.
of 65 entry-page affiliate funnels. It runs 3 of 10 selling tactics. 4 of 12 UX checks pass.


How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Across all 690 entry-page captures: beats 62%.
Peer rank
Beats 38%.
of 65 entry-page affiliate funnels. Across all 690 entry-page captures: beats 62%.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“The free name combiner for every kind of name”
- Tools
- View all articles →
How it’s built
12 UX checks · 4 need work · 4 pass · 3 notes · 1 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
51% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 39% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 12px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Oversized images
12 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
See all 12 checks
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line length
6 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 57 content images carry alt text.
Skip link
No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
Label in name
1 control has an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
Page weight
At least 0.0 MB across 9 measurable resources, but 28 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Render-blocking resources
2 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Tap-target size (mobile)
185 of 241 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
How it looks
Plus Jakarta Sans for headlines, Inter for text. 6 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
3 of 10 selling tactics found: FAQ / objection handling, Trusted-by logo wall, Ranked "best of" list. 7 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 7 it lacks
- Outbound offer CTAs4% of affiliate funnels have it (7 of 166).
- Proof above the fold16% of funnels have it (430 of 2,675).
- Usage / adoption proof14% of funnels have it (312 of 2,284).
- Affiliate disclosure25% of affiliate funnels have it (42 of 166).
- Press / "as seen in"24% of funnels have it (628 of 2,672).
- Us-vs-them comparison19% of funnels have it (510 of 2,675).
- Scarcity / urgency copy5% of funnels have it (138 of 2,672).
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour and size
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Ranked "best of" list · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 3 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Ranked "best of" list · the evidence
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Affiliate disclosure · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 2 on the first page
Plus
Colours and type, in full.
Every colour and size we measured.
Colours · 6 measured, with their share
Type · Plus Jakarta Sans, 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Compare
Put your site next to namecombinerss.us.
Every number, side by side.

On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.