spiderfoot.app
Beats 4%.
of 2,071 multi-step funnels we’ve measured.
What it skips
spiderfoot.app misses 1 thing most peers do.
Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.
Trusted-by logo wallMISSING53% of 121 content funnels do this. spiderfoot.app doesn't. · 64 of 121
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 13% of 156 content funnels do this. · 20 of 156
Examples of this
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 12% of 156 content funnels do this. · 18 of 156
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 10% of 121 content funnels do this. · 12 of 121
Us-vs-them comparisonOpportunityOnly 5% of 156 content funnels do this. · 8 of 156
Examples of this
- adhdprivate.co.ukcomparison grid: 24 rows
- submityourstartup.nowcomparison table: SITE · AUDIENCE · FREE OPTION? · PRICING, AS SHOWN ON SITE · H
- clipturn.appcomparison table: Capability · ClipTurn FixQuotes · Clipchamp Microsoft · Lossle
- vibeboot.devcomparison grid: 25 rows
- tienrank.comcomparison table: CATEGORÍA · PRODUCTOS · PRECIO · PARA QUIÉN · DIFERENCIAL
- symbioticpharma.iscomparison table: COMPOUND · CLASSIFICATION · RESEARCH AREA · EVIDENCE OVERVIEW
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 3% of 156 content funnels do this. · 4 of 156
Examples of this
Captures of this
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Peer rank
Beats 4%.
of 2,071 multi-step funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“SpiderFoot OSINT. See the wider footprint.”
- WORKSPACE Guest
- Run scan
How it’s built
22 UX checks · 10 pass · 4 need work · 6 notes · 2 not measured
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.56×.
Form labels
All 1 form field carries a label.
Named controls
Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.
Link text
No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Show the other 16 checks
Heading levels
No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (50 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Skip link
A same-page “skip to content” link was found.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Line length
1 paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.
Image alt text
1 of 20 content images (5%) have no alt attribute.
Label in name
3 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
Render-blocking resources
5 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Oversized images
3 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Keyboard reachability
9 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
92% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Language declared
No html[lang] attribute. screen readers can’t pick the right voice.
Landmark regions
No <main> or <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
Page weight
At least 2.9 MB across 15 measurable resources, but 13 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
Seen on the page
The sections of spiderfoot.app where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.
FAQ / objection handling1 crop
FAQ · Homepage / Lander
How it looks
Inter for headlines and text. 9 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
1 of 7 selling tactic found: FAQ / objection handling. 6 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 6 it lacks
- Trusted-by logo wall53% of 121 content funnels do this. spiderfoot.app doesn't. Gap
- Proof above the foldOnly 13% of 156 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Press / "as seen in"Only 12% of 156 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 10% of 121 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 5% of 156 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 3% of 156 content funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour and size
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 1 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Trusted-by logo wall · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 2 on the first page
Plus
Colours and type, in full.
Every colour and size we measured.
Colours · 9 measured, with their share
Type · Inter, 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · spiderfoot.app · Compare
← Back to the spiderfoot.app reportCompare
Put your site next to spiderfoot.app.
Every number, side by side.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.