splitimage.im
Beats 8%.
of 70 entry-page affiliate funnels we’ve measured.
What it skips
splitimage.im misses 1 thing most peers do.
Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.
Trusted-by logo wallMISSING57% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. splitimage.im doesn't. · 40 of 70
Press / "as seen in"Opportunity30% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. · 21 of 70
Affiliate disclosureOpportunityOnly 20% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. · 14 of 70
Examples of this
Us-vs-them comparisonOpportunityOnly 11% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. · 8 of 70
Examples of this
- minipcprice.comcomparison table: Price · Brand · CPU · RAM · Storage · GPU · OS · Condition · L
- diskprices.toolscomparison table: $/TB · Price · Capacity · Brand · Media Type · Interface · Con
- spotmp3.netcomparison grid: 9 rows
- math-charts.comcomparison grid: 13 rows
- narutosenkidl.comcomparison table: FEATURE · NARUTO SENKI · NARUTO MOBILE (TENCENT)
- pdftoflipbook.incomparison grid: 7 rows
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 10% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. · 7 of 70
Examples of this
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 6% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. · 4 of 70
Examples of this
Captures of this
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 4% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. · 3 of 70
Examples of this
Captures of this
Outbound offer CTAsOpportunityOnly 3% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. · 2 of 70
Examples of this
Captures of this
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 8%.
of 70 entry-page affiliate funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Split Image Online Free”
- Popular Tools
- Feedback
- 2×2
- 3×3
- 1×2
- 2×1
- 1×3
- 3×1
How it’s built
11 UX checks · 5 pass · 2 need work · 3 notes · 1 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
97% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 14px; first paragraph 11px.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Render-blocking resources
2 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Line length
3 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Show the other 5 checks
Heading levels
1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.
Keyboard reachability
13 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.
Named controls
18 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Tap-target size (mobile)
87 of 104 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
Page weight
At least 0.5 MB across 30 measurable resources, but 24 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Seen on the page
The sections of splitimage.im where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.
FAQ / objection handling1 crop
FAQ · Homepage / Lander
How it looks
Inter Variable for headlines and text. 10 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
2 of 10 selling tactics found: FAQ / objection handling, Ranked "best of" list. 8 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 8 it lacks
- Trusted-by logo wall57% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. splitimage.im doesn't. Gap
- Press / "as seen in"30% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
- Affiliate disclosureOnly 20% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
- Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 11% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 10% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 6% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 4% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
- Outbound offer CTAsOnly 3% of 70 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Ranked "best of" list · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 2 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Ranked "best of" list · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Trusted-by logo wall · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Affiliate disclosure · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 12 on the first page
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 10 colours measured
Type scale · 10 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · splitimage.im · Compare
← Back to the splitimage.im reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to splitimage.im?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
splitimage.im
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.