vercel.link

Beats 26%.

of 1,615 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

Scanned 2026-11-01SaaS

What it skips

vercel.link misses 1 thing most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 26%.

of 1,615 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 26% of 1615 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Agentic Infrastructure”

  • Products
  • Resources
  • Sign Up

How it’s built

22 UX checks · 13 pass · 5 need work · 2 notes · 2 not measured

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.43×.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 11 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Form labels

All 1 form field carries a label.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Show the other 16 checks
Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (31 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Skip link

A same-page “skip to content” link was found.

Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Landmark regions

The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Note

Line length

2 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Heading levels

2 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Needs work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

94% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Named controls

343 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Needs work

Render-blocking resources

66 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Needs work

Oversized images

21 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 3.3 MB across 287 measurable resources, but 294 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Seen on the page

The sections of vercel.link where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • Trusted-by logo wall1 crop
    • vercel.link Logos section, Solutions
      Logos · Solutions

How it looks

GeistSans for headlines, Geist Mono for text. 4 colours measured.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

4 of 11 selling tactics found: Demo / docs entry, Pricing tiers, Trusted-by logo wall, Free trial / freemium. 7 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 7 it lacks
    • FAQ / objection handling80% of 1,611 SaaS funnels do this. vercel.link doesn't. Gap
    • Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,611 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 28% of 1,611 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,611 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 19% of 1,611 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,611 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,611 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Demo / docs entry · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 4 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Demo / docs entry · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

FAQ / objection handling · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 3 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 25

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 4 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 8 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.34.0 on 2026-11-01, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 147 links on the entry page, 107 walkable. 4 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · vercel.link · Compare

← Back to the vercel.link report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to vercel.link?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

vercel.link

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.