weathermarrakech.com

Beats 7%.

of 69 entry-page affiliate funnels we’ve measured.

weathermarrakech.com desktop capture of the first page

Something wrong?

Scanned 2026-11-02Affiliate

Below the fold

Section by section.

Each part of the page, with our check beside it.

  1. No crop

    This section is only 2% of the page, too thin to show without cutting in the one next to it.

    Content · 0% to 2% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 4 buttons and links, “HOME” and “BLOG”, 5 words. Absent, not scored 0.

  2. No crop

    This section is only 2% of the page, too thin to show without cutting in the one next to it.

    Content · 73% to 75% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 22 words. Absent, not scored 0.

  3. No crop

    This section is only 5% of the page, too thin to show without cutting in the one next to it.

    Email capture · 76% to 81% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 1 button or link, “Subscribe”, a form, 25 words. Absent, not scored 0.

  4. No crop

    This section is only 4% of the page, too thin to show without cutting in the one next to it.

    Content · 96% to 100% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 5 words. Absent, not scored 0.

Sections of Homepage / Lander. Crops are portions of the page, shown beside our analysis. Measured by Roentgen 1.35.0 on 2026-11-02. A section with nothing detected is absent, never scored 0.

Something wrong?

What it skips

weathermarrakech.com misses 1 thing most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 7%.

of 69 entry-page affiliate funnels.

beats 7% of 69 entry-page affiliate funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Marrakech Weather Today”

  • 🇬🇧 EN
  • Subscribe

How it’s built

26 UX checks · 13 pass · 5 need work · 7 notes · 1 not measured

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.4×.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 79 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Show the other 20 checks
Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (54 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Landmark regions

The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Pass

Input types

No email or phone field uses type="text".

Pass

Inline validation

1 field carries validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).

Note

Line length

1 paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Form labels

1 form field relies on placeholder text as the only label.

Note

Heading levels

1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Render-blocking resources

7 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Note

Oversized images

3 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Note

Autocomplete hints

No autocomplete attributes across 1 field. browsers cannot autofill.

Needs work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

85% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 76% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 9px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Named controls

7 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Needs work

Page weight

At least 5.1 MB across 39 measurable resources. 36 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

34 of 61 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

How it looks

Outfit for headlines and text. 8 colours measured.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

2 of 10 selling tactics found: FAQ / objection handling, Ranked "best of" list. 8 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 8 it lacks
    • Trusted-by logo wall58% of 69 affiliate funnels do this. weathermarrakech.com doesn't. Gap
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 26% of 69 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Affiliate disclosureOnly 19% of 69 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 10% of 69 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 10% of 69 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 6% of 69 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 4% of 69 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Outbound offer CTAsOnly 3% of 69 affiliate funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Ranked "best of" list · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 2 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Ranked "best of" list · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Trusted-by logo wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Affiliate disclosure · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 2 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 8 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 12 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.35.0 on 2026-11-02, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 40 links seen, 30 walkable, and 0 matched a funnel step. If this funnel continues past the entry page, we did not reach it — everything below is measured from the entry page alone.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · weathermarrakech.com · Compare

← Back to the weathermarrakech.com report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to weathermarrakech.com?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

weathermarrakech.com

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

weathermarrakech.com

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.