This report was measured 47 days ago — past our freshness window.

aiphotoreditor.com

Beats 12%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

aiphotoreditor.com desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
  1. 1
  2. 2
Scanned 2026-09-15SaaS

What it skips

aiphotoreditor.com misses 1 thing most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 12%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 12% of 1608 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“AI Photo Editor Online — Edit Photos with a Prompt”

  • Generate
  • AI TOOLS ▸
  • 1
  • Single Edit
  • Multi Fusion Pro
  • Upload Image
  • Replace background
  • Change hair color

How it’s built

16 UX checks · 4 pass · 4 need work · 7 notes · 1 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

98% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 66 content images carry alt text.

Note

Line length

7 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Form labels

1 form field relies on placeholder text as the only label.

Show the other 10 checks
Note

Heading levels

2 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Render-blocking resources

4 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Note

Landmark regions

No <main> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Note

Keyboard reachability

107 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 8px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Named controls

2 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Needs work

Oversized images

6 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

87 of 107 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 0.7 MB across 22 measurable resources, but 44 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

How it looks

Trebuchet MS for headlines and text. 10 colours measured.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

3 of 11 selling tactics found: Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 8 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 8 it lacks
    • Pricing tiers54% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. aiphotoreditor.com doesn't. Gap
    • Demo / docs entry36% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 3 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Pricing tiers · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 12 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 7

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 10 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 12 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.27.0 on 2026-09-15, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 37 links on the entry page, 30 walkable. 1 matched a funnel step; we captured 2 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · aiphotoreditor.com · Compare

← Back to the aiphotoreditor.com report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to aiphotoreditor.com?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

aiphotoreditor.com

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.