cardgrade.io
Beats 70%.
of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.
What sets it apart
cardgrade.io does 2 things few peers do.
Each one is run by under 30% of 1,604 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.
-
Proof above the fold
Rarity
Only 18%.
of 1,604 SaaS funnels have proof above the fold. This site is one of them.
18 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 82 wait outside.
292 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where cardgrade.io does it · Pricing: “from 94 App Store ratings · June 2026 snapshot” FOUND. Only 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. cardgrade.io does. 292 of 1604 SaaS funnels.
Examples of this
Crops from this site 1
Hero · Pricing
-
Us-vs-them comparison
Rarity
Only 28%.
of 1,604 SaaS funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.
28 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 72 wait outside.
452 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where cardgrade.io does it · Features: “comparison table: Feature · Free · Starter · Pro Popular · Business” FOUND. Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. cardgrade.io does. 452 of 1604 SaaS funnels.
Crops from this site 1
Comparison · Features
What it skips
cardgrade.io misses 1 thing most peers do.
Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.
Free trial / freemiumMISSING81% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. cardgrade.io doesn't. · 1300 of 1604
Lead-capture formOpportunityOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 461 of 1604
Examples of this
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 372 of 1604
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 262 of 1604
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 86 of 1604
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 70%.
of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Pre-grade your cards before PSA does.”
- Tools
- Resources
- Subscribe
- Cookie Preferences
- Your Privacy Choices
- Start grading
- Try it on your own card
How it’s built
26 UX checks · 16 pass · 4 need work · 5 notes · 1 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
96% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.4×.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 6 content images carry alt text.
Link text
No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.
Show the other 20 checks
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Heading levels
No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (57 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Skip link
A same-page “skip to content” link was found.
Label in name
No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Render-blocking resources
3 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Landmark regions
The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.
Input types
No email or phone field uses type="text".
Inline validation
4 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).
Line length
32 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Form labels
4 form fields rely on placeholder text as the only label.
Oversized images
3 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Keyboard reachability
2 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.
Autocomplete hints
No autocomplete attributes across 4 fields. browsers cannot autofill.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Named controls
1 button/link has no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Page weight
At least 7.2 MB across 467 measurable resources. 100 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.
Tap-target size (mobile)
260 of 317 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
Seen on the page
The sections of cardgrade.io where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.
Proof above the fold1 crop
Hero · Pricing
Us-vs-them comparison1 crop
Comparison · Features
FAQ / objection handling2 crops
FAQ · Homepage / Lander FAQ · Pricing
How it looks
dmSans for headlines and text. 10 colours measured.
Worth borrowing
Proof above the fold: Only 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. cardgrade.io does.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
6 of 11 selling tactics found: Proof above the fold, Us-vs-them comparison, Demo / docs entry, Pricing tiers, Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling. 5 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 5 it lacks
- Free trial / freemium81% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. cardgrade.io doesn't. Gap
- Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
Proof above the fold · the evidence
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 6 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Proof above the fold · the evidence
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Free trial / freemium · who has it
Lead-capture form · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 7 on the first page
Prices seen · 19
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 10 colours measured
Type scale · 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · cardgrade.io · Compare
← Back to the cardgrade.io reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to cardgrade.io?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
cardgrade.io
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.