enhancerphoto.com

Beats 49%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

enhancerphoto.com desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
  1. 1
  2. 2
Scanned 2026-10-31SaaS

What sets it apart

enhancerphoto.com does 1 thing few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 1,604 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Us-vs-them comparison

    Rarity

    Only 28%.

    of 1,604 SaaS funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.

    28 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 72 wait outside.

    452 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    enhancerphoto.com Homepage / Lander capture, where it does this
    Where enhancerphoto.com does it · Homepage / Lander: “comparison grid: 4 rows”

    FOUND. Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. enhancerphoto.com does. 452 of 1604 SaaS funnels.

    Examples of this
    Captures of this
    Crops from this site 3
    • enhancerphoto.com Comparison section, Homepage / Lander
      Comparison · Homepage / Lander
    • enhancerphoto.com Comparison section, Homepage / Lander
      Comparison · Homepage / Lander
    • enhancerphoto.com Comparison section, Homepage / Lander
      Comparison · Homepage / Lander

What it skips

Nothing most peers do is missing.

6 tactics enhancerphoto.com could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 49%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 49% of 1608 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Photo Enhancer — Improve Photo Quality Online”

  • Tools
  • My account
  • General
  • Portrait
  • Object
  • Landscape
  • Pet
  • Text

How it’s built

23 UX checks · 14 pass · 4 need work · 3 notes · 2 not measured

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.6×.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 225 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Form labels

All 1 form field carries a label.

Pass

Named controls

Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.

Show the other 17 checks
Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Heading levels

No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (61 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Skip link

A same-page “skip to content” link was found.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

3 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Pass

Landmark regions

The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.

Note

Line length

37 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Label in name

1 control has an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

Note

Keyboard reachability

11 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

Needs work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

92% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Oversized images

34 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

159 of 423 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 2.1 MB across 170 measurable resources, but 155 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Seen on the page

The sections of enhancerphoto.com where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • Us-vs-them comparison3 crops
    • enhancerphoto.com Comparison section, Homepage / Lander
      Comparison · Homepage / Lander
    • enhancerphoto.com Comparison section, Homepage / Lander
      Comparison · Homepage / Lander
    • enhancerphoto.com Comparison section, Homepage / Lander
      Comparison · Homepage / Lander
  • FAQ / objection handling1 crop
    • enhancerphoto.com FAQ section, Homepage / Lander
      FAQ · Homepage / Lander

How it looks

Inter for headlines and text. 10 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Us-vs-them comparison: Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. enhancerphoto.com does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

5 of 11 selling tactics found: Us-vs-them comparison, Pricing tiers, Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 6 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 6 it lacks
    • Demo / docs entry36% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 5 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Demo / docs entry · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 12 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 7

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 10 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 12 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.34.0 on 2026-10-31, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 46 links on the entry page, 39 walkable. 1 matched a funnel step; we captured 2 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · enhancerphoto.com · Compare

← Back to the enhancerphoto.com report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to enhancerphoto.com?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

enhancerphoto.com

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

enhancerphoto.com

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.