formcrier.com

Beats 70%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

formcrier.com desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
Scanned 2026-10-31SaaS

What sets it apart

formcrier.com does 2 things few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 1,604 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Us-vs-them comparison

    Rarity

    Only 28%.

    of 1,604 SaaS funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.

    28 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 72 wait outside.

    452 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    formcrier.com Pricing capture, where it does this
    Where formcrier.com does it · Pricing: “comparison grid: 14 rows”

    FOUND. Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. formcrier.com does. 452 of 1604 SaaS funnels.

  2. Lead-capture form

    Rarity

    Only 29%.

    of 1,604 SaaS funnels have lead-capture form. This site is one of them.

    29 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 71 wait outside.

    461 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    formcrier.com Register capture, where it does this
    Where formcrier.com does it · Register: “name, email, password”

    FOUND. Only 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. formcrier.com does. 461 of 1604 SaaS funnels.

What it skips

formcrier.com misses 1 thing most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 70%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 70% of 1608 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Every enquiry rings your phone.”

  • Sending…
  • WhatsApp
  • Play video (20 seconds, with sound) · 0:20
  • Copy
  • £ GBP
  • € EUR
  • $ USD
  • How quickly do alerts arrive? –

How it’s built

26 UX checks · 18 pass · 5 need work · 1 note · 2 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.5×.

Pass

Line length

No sampled paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 18 content images carry alt text.

Show the other 20 checks
Pass

Form labels

All 6 form fields carry a label.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Heading levels

No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (58 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Skip link

A same-page “skip to content” link was found.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

2 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Pass

Input types

No email or phone field uses type="text".

Pass

Autocomplete hints

5 of 6 fields carry an autocomplete attribute.

Pass

Inline validation

3 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).

Note

Label in name

4 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Named controls

1 button/link has no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Needs work

Oversized images

18 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Landmark regions

No <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

63 of 101 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 0.4 MB across 16 measurable resources, but 35 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Seen on the page

The sections of formcrier.com where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • FAQ / objection handling1 crop
    • formcrier.com FAQ section, Homepage / Lander
      FAQ · Homepage / Lander

How it looks

Bricolage Grotesque Variable for headlines, Instrument Sans Variable for text. 10 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Us-vs-them comparison: Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. formcrier.com does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

6 of 11 selling tactics found: Us-vs-them comparison, Lead-capture form, Demo / docs entry, Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 5 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 5 it lacks
    • Pricing tiers54% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. formcrier.com doesn't. Gap
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 6 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Pricing tiers · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 12 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 7

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 10 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 12 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.34.0 on 2026-10-31, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 36 links on the entry page, 23 walkable. 2 matched a funnel step; we captured 3 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · formcrier.com · Compare

← Back to the formcrier.com report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to formcrier.com?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

formcrier.com

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.