hsr88.github.io

Beats 4%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

Scanned 2026-10-28SaaS

What sets it apart

hsr88.github.io does 1 thing few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 1,604 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Us-vs-them comparison

    Rarity

    Only 28%.

    of 1,604 SaaS funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.

    28 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 72 wait outside.

    452 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    hsr88.github.io Homepage / Lander capture, where it does this
    Where hsr88.github.io does it · Homepage / Lander: “comparison table: Screenshot · Record”

    FOUND. Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. hsr88.github.io does. 452 of 1604 SaaS funnels.

What it skips

hsr88.github.io misses 3 things most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 4%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 4% of 1608 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Screenshot or record an entire webpage.”

  • Add to Chrome
  • GitHub
  • Support

How it’s built

22 UX checks · 16 pass · 2 need work · 2 notes · 2 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 14px; first paragraph 14px.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.5×.

Pass

Line length

No sampled paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Show the other 16 checks
Pass

Image alt text

All 2 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Heading levels

No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (51 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 390px wide.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

1 stylesheet/script in <head> block first paint.

Pass

Landmark regions

The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Oversized images

2 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

19 of 19 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Needs work

Named controls

1 button/link has no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Not checked

Page weight

At least 0.0 MB across 2 measurable resources, but 8 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Seen on the page

The sections of hsr88.github.io where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • FAQ / objection handling1 crop
    • hsr88.github.io FAQ section, Homepage / Lander
      FAQ · Homepage / Lander

How it looks

Georgia for headlines, Segoe UI for text. 2 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Us-vs-them comparison: Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. hsr88.github.io does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

2 of 11 selling tactics found: Us-vs-them comparison, FAQ / objection handling. 9 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 9 it lacks
    • Free trial / freemium81% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. hsr88.github.io doesn't. Gap
    • Trusted-by logo wall79% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. hsr88.github.io doesn't. Gap
    • Pricing tiers54% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. hsr88.github.io doesn't. Gap
    • Demo / docs entry36% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 2 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Free trial / freemium · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 3 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 2 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 4 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.34.0 on 2026-10-28, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 2 links on the entry page, 1 walkable. 1 matched a funnel step; we captured 2 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · hsr88.github.io · Compare

← Back to the hsr88.github.io report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to hsr88.github.io?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

hsr88.github.io

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.