kingprom.pt
Beats 26%.
of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.
What sets it apart
kingprom.pt does 1 thing few peers do.
Each one is run by under 30% of 1,604 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.
-
Press / "as seen in"
Rarity
Only 23%.
of 1,604 SaaS funnels have press / "as seen in". This site is one of them.
23 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 77 wait outside.
372 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where kingprom.pt does it · Kokoro: “featured on” FOUND. Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. kingprom.pt does. 372 of 1604 SaaS funnels.
What it skips
kingprom.pt misses 2 things most peers do.
Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.
FAQ / objection handlingMISSING80% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. kingprom.pt doesn't. · 1281 of 1604
Pricing tiersMISSING54% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. kingprom.pt doesn't. · 874 of 1604
Lead-capture formOpportunityOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 461 of 1604
Examples of this
Us-vs-them comparisonOpportunityOnly 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 452 of 1604
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 292 of 1604
Examples of this
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 262 of 1604
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 86 of 1604
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 26%.
of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Discover, Tune, and Launch AI Tools”
- Search... ⌘K
- Sign in
- All Tools (42)
- AI Community (13)
- Frontier Models
- Autonomous Agents
- IDEs & DevTools
- Read more
How it’s built
26 UX checks · 11 pass · 4 need work · 9 notes · 2 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 15% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.5×.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 47 content images carry alt text.
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Show the other 20 checks
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (59 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Landmark regions
The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.
Input types
No email or phone field uses type="text".
Inline validation
4 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).
Line length
6 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Link text
13 links use generic text (“click here” / “learn more”).
Heading levels
2 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.
Skip link
No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
Label in name
6 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.
Render-blocking resources
7 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Oversized images
4 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Keyboard reachability
31 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.
Autocomplete hints
No autocomplete attributes across 12 fields. browsers cannot autofill.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Form labels
4 of 13 form fields have no label (+8 rely on placeholder only).
Named controls
29 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Tap-target size (mobile)
58 of 76 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
Page weight
At least 4.4 MB across 89 measurable resources, but 86 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
How it looks
system-ui for headlines and text. 2 colours measured.
Worth borrowing
Press / "as seen in": Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. kingprom.pt does.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
4 of 11 selling tactics found: Press / "as seen in", Demo / docs entry, Trusted-by logo wall, Free trial / freemium. 7 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 7 it lacks
- FAQ / objection handling80% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. kingprom.pt doesn't. Gap
- Pricing tiers54% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. kingprom.pt doesn't. Gap
- Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
Press / "as seen in" · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 4 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Press / "as seen in" · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
FAQ / objection handling · who has it
Pricing tiers · who has it
Lead-capture form · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 12 on the first page
Prices seen · 15
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 2 colours measured
Type scale · 8 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · kingprom.pt · Compare
← Back to the kingprom.pt reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to kingprom.pt?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
kingprom.pt
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.