linkjob.ai

Beats 70%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

linkjob.ai desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
Scanned 2026-10-30SaaS

What sets it apart

linkjob.ai does 2 things few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 1,604 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Usage / adoption proof

    Rarity

    Only 16%.

    of 1,604 SaaS funnels have usage / adoption proof. This site is one of them.

    16 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 84 wait outside.

    262 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    linkjob.ai Homepage / Lander capture, where it does this
    Where linkjob.ai does it · Homepage / Lander: “1700+ Companies”

    FOUND. Only 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. linkjob.ai does. 262 of 1604 SaaS funnels.

  2. Proof above the fold

    Rarity

    Only 18%.

    of 1,604 SaaS funnels have proof above the fold. This site is one of them.

    18 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 82 wait outside.

    292 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    linkjob.ai Homepage / Lander capture, where it does this
    Where linkjob.ai does it · Homepage / Lander: “1700+ Companies Landed”

    FOUND. Only 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. linkjob.ai does. 292 of 1604 SaaS funnels.

What it skips

Nothing most peers do is missing.

5 tactics linkjob.ai could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 70%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 70% of 1608 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Your Undetectable AI Interview Assistant Real-Time AI Help For Every Interview”

  • Download Now
  • Download the app See plans
  • Download the app
  • See plans
  • Watch Linkjob AI Interview Copilot in Action
  • Standard Browsers & Web Platforms
  • Locked Browsers & Proctoring Clients
  • View more reviews

How it’s built

22 UX checks · 11 pass · 5 need work · 4 notes · 2 not measured

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.35×.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 216 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Named controls

Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Show the other 16 checks
Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (68 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Landmark regions

The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Note

Line length

7 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Heading levels

1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Label in name

44 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

Needs work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

79% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Render-blocking resources

8 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Needs work

Oversized images

111 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

265 of 351 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 0.7 MB across 60 measurable resources, but 281 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Seen on the page

The sections of linkjob.ai where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • Proof above the fold1 crop
    • linkjob.ai Hero section, Homepage / Lander
      Hero · Homepage / Lander
  • FAQ / objection handling2 crops
    • linkjob.ai FAQ section, Homepage / Lander
      FAQ · Homepage / Lander
    • linkjob.ai FAQ section, Pricing
      FAQ · Pricing

How it looks

Asul for headlines, DM Sans for text. 10 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Usage / adoption proof: Only 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. linkjob.ai does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

6 of 11 selling tactics found: Usage / adoption proof, Proof above the fold, Pricing tiers, Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 5 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 5 it lacks
    • Demo / docs entry36% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Usage / adoption proof · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 6 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Usage / adoption proof · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Demo / docs entry · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 12 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 7

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 10 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 12 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.34.0 on 2026-10-30, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 119 links on the entry page, 112 walkable. 2 matched a funnel step; we captured 3 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · linkjob.ai · Compare

← Back to the linkjob.ai report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to linkjob.ai?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

linkjob.ai

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.