This report was measured 47 days ago — past our freshness window.

rigordesk.com

Beats 49%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

rigordesk.com desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
Scanned 2026-09-15SaaS

What sets it apart

rigordesk.com does 1 thing few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 1,604 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Proof above the fold

    Rarity

    Only 18%.

    of 1,604 SaaS funnels have proof above the fold. This site is one of them.

    18 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 82 wait outside.

    291 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    rigordesk.com Pricing capture, where it does this
    Where rigordesk.com does it · Pricing: “MONTHLY ALLOWANCE 2 Refinement reviews / month”

    FOUND. Only 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. rigordesk.com does. 291 of 1604 SaaS funnels.

What it skips

rigordesk.com misses 1 thing most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 49%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 49% of 1608 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“A good answer can take a challenge.”

  • Accept analytics cookies
  • Reject analytics cookies
  • See what each cookie does
  • Start free ↗
  • Business proposal
  • AI answer
  • Technical plan
  • Two SDRs will add $600k in pipeline within 90 days.1

How it’s built

14 UX checks · 7 pass · 2 need work · 5 notes · 0 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 4 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Page weight

At least 1.4 MB across 600 measurable resources. 3 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

1 stylesheet/script in <head> block first paint.

Show the other 8 checks
Pass

Inline validation

1 field carries validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).

Note

Heading levels

1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Note

Label in name

8 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

Note

Oversized images

4 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Note

Keyboard reachability

6 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

Note

Autocomplete hints

No autocomplete attributes across 4 fields. browsers cannot autofill.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

106 of 170 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Seen on the page

The sections of rigordesk.com where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • Proof above the fold1 crop
    • rigordesk.com Hero section, Features
      Hero · Features
  • FAQ / objection handling1 crop
    • rigordesk.com FAQ section, Pricing
      FAQ · Pricing

How it looks

Hanken Grotesk for headlines and text. 5 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Proof above the fold: Only 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. rigordesk.com does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

5 of 11 selling tactics found: Proof above the fold, Demo / docs entry, Pricing tiers, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 6 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 6 it lacks
    • Trusted-by logo wall79% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. rigordesk.com doesn't. Gap
    • Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Proof above the fold · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 5 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Proof above the fold · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Trusted-by logo wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 12 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 17

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 5 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 12 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.27.0 on 2026-09-15, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 41 links on the entry page, 32 walkable. 3 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · rigordesk.com · Compare

← Back to the rigordesk.com report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to rigordesk.com?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

rigordesk.com

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.