s1.dev
Beats 70%.
of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.
What sets it apart
s1.dev does 1 thing few peers do.
Each one is run by under 30% of 1,604 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.
-
Us-vs-them comparison
Rarity
Only 28%.
of 1,604 SaaS funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.
28 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 72 wait outside.
452 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where s1.dev does it · Homepage / Lander: “Search1API All-in-one web access Exa Neural search Firecrawl Crawl & scrape SerpApi SERP s” FOUND. Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. s1.dev does. 452 of 1604 SaaS funnels.
Crops from this site 1
Comparison · Homepage / Lander
What it skips
Nothing most peers do is missing.
5 tactics s1.dev could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.
Lead-capture formOpportunityOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 460 of 1604
Examples of this
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 373 of 1604
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 291 of 1604
Examples of this
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 261 of 1604
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. · 86 of 1604
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 70%.
of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Give your AI agents the live web”
- Features
- Integrations
- Proxies
- Resources
- Dashboard
- Get 100 free credits Read the docs
- Get 100 free credits
- Read the docs
How it’s built
11 UX checks · 3 pass · 5 need work · 2 notes · 1 not measured
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 15 content images carry alt text.
Line length
2 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Heading levels
2 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
89% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
Show the other 5 checks
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 9px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Render-blocking resources
17 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Oversized images
7 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Tap-target size (mobile)
142 of 192 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
Page weight
At least 1.4 MB across 147 measurable resources, but 69 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Seen on the page
The sections of s1.dev where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.
Us-vs-them comparison1 crop
Comparison · Homepage / Lander
Trusted-by logo wall1 crop
Logos · Homepage / Lander
FAQ / objection handling1 crop
FAQ · Homepage / Lander
How it looks
Outfit for headlines and text. 10 colours measured.
Worth borrowing
Us-vs-them comparison: Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. s1.dev does.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
6 of 11 selling tactics found: Us-vs-them comparison, Demo / docs entry, Pricing tiers, Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 5 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 5 it lacks
- Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 6 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Lead-capture form · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 12 on the first page
Prices seen · 18
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 10 colours measured
Type scale · 9 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · s1.dev · Compare
← Back to the s1.dev reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to s1.dev?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
s1.dev
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.