scanchess.com

Beats 70%.

of 1,582 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

Scanned 2026-10-30SaaS

What sets it apart

scanchess.com does 2 things few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 1,578 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Scarcity / urgency copy

    Rarity

    Only 6%.

    of 1,578 SaaS funnels have scarcity / urgency copy. This site is one of them.

    6 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 94 wait outside.

    87 of 1578 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    scanchess.com Pricing capture, where it does this
    Where scanchess.com does it · Pricing: “99 today”

    FOUND. Only 6% of 1,578 SaaS funnels do this. scanchess.com does. 87 of 1578 SaaS funnels.

  2. Us-vs-them comparison

    Rarity

    Only 28%.

    of 1,578 SaaS funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.

    28 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 72 wait outside.

    442 of 1578 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    scanchess.com Pricing capture, where it does this
    Where scanchess.com does it · Pricing: “comparison grid: 20 rows”

    FOUND. Only 28% of 1,578 SaaS funnels do this. scanchess.com does. 442 of 1578 SaaS funnels.

What it skips

Nothing most peers do is missing.

5 tactics scanchess.com could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 70%.

of 1,582 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 70% of 1582 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Chess images to FEN. Scoresheets to PGN.”

  • EN
  • Board image Screenshots, diagrams, photos
  • Handwritten scoresheet One game, one or more pages
  • Copy FEN
  • Find a tool: FEN, GIF, rating… /
  • Cookie settings

How it’s built

22 UX checks · 16 pass · 2 need work · 2 notes · 2 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 13px; first paragraph 16px.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.5×.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 22 content images carry alt text.

Show the other 16 checks
Pass

Form labels

All 3 form fields carry a label.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Heading levels

No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (52 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Skip link

A same-page “skip to content” link was found.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

2 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Pass

Landmark regions

The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Note

Line length

12 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Label in name

1 control has an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

Needs work

Named controls

99 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Needs work

Oversized images

11 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 0.8 MB across 142 measurable resources, but 197 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Seen on the page

The sections of scanchess.com where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.

  • FAQ / objection handling1 crop
    • scanchess.com FAQ section, Homepage / Lander
      FAQ · Homepage / Lander

How it looks

Onest Variable for headlines and text. 8 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Scarcity / urgency copy: Only 6% of 1,578 SaaS funnels do this. scanchess.com does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

6 of 11 selling tactics found: Scarcity / urgency copy, Us-vs-them comparison, Pricing tiers, Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 5 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 5 it lacks
    • Demo / docs entry36% of 1,578 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,578 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 24% of 1,578 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 18% of 1,578 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 17% of 1,578 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour and size

Scarcity / urgency copy · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 6 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Scarcity / urgency copy · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Free trial / freemium · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Demo / docs entry · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Usage / adoption proof · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 6 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 10

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colours and type, in full.

Every colour and size we measured.

Colours · 8 measured, with their share

Plus · $29/mo

Type · Onest Variable, 9 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Get Plus · $29/moOpening soon.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.34.0 on 2026-10-30, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 97 links on the entry page, 86 walkable. 2 matched a funnel step; we captured 3 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · scanchess.com · Compare

← Back to the scanchess.com report

Compare

Put your site next to scanchess.com.

Every number, side by side.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.