snappix.app
Beats 69%.
of 1,579 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.
What sets it apart
snappix.app does 2 things few peers do.
Each one is run by under 30% of 1,575 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.
-
Us-vs-them comparison
Rarity
Only 28%.
of 1,575 SaaS funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.
28 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 72 wait outside.
437 of 1575 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where snappix.app does it · Homepage / Lander: “comparison table: FEATURE · MACOS BUILT-IN · DESIGN APPS · SUBSCRIPTION SUITES · SNAPPIX” FOUND. Only 28% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. snappix.app does. 437 of 1575 SaaS funnels.
Crops from this site 1
Comparison · Homepage / Lander
-
Lead-capture form
Rarity
Only 29%.
of 1,575 SaaS funnels have lead-capture form. This site is one of them.
29 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 71 wait outside.
453 of 1575 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where snappix.app does it · Auth: “name, email, password” FOUND. Only 29% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. snappix.app does. 453 of 1575 SaaS funnels.
Examples of this
What it skips
snappix.app misses 1 thing most peers do.
Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.
Pricing tiersMISSING55% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. snappix.app doesn't. · 870 of 1575
Examples of this
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 25% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. · 398 of 1575
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 18% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. · 286 of 1575
Examples of this
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 17% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. · 260 of 1575
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 6% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. · 87 of 1575
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 69%.
of 1,579 multi-step SaaS funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Screenshot & Record Your Screen with Pixel-Perfect Precision”
- Free Tools
- Resources
- Log in
- Switch language
- Cookie Settings
- Download
- Sign up
- Free Trial Download
How it’s built
26 UX checks · 15 pass · 6 need work · 3 notes · 2 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.43×.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 83 content images carry alt text.
Link text
No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.
Show the other 20 checks
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Heading levels
No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (53 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Skip link
A same-page “skip to content” link was found.
Label in name
No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Keyboard reachability
No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.
Input types
No email or phone field uses type="text".
Inline validation
2 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).
Line length
7 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Form labels
1 form field relies on placeholder text as the only label.
Autocomplete hints
No autocomplete attributes across 3 fields. browsers cannot autofill.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 9px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Named controls
1 button/link has no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Render-blocking resources
14 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Oversized images
7 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Landmark regions
No <header> or <main> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
Tap-target size (mobile)
115 of 205 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
Page weight
At least 2.6 MB across 251 measurable resources, but 105 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
Seen on the page
The sections of snappix.app where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.
Us-vs-them comparison1 crop
Comparison · Homepage / Lander
Trusted-by logo wall1 crop
Logos · Pricing
FAQ / objection handling1 crop
FAQ · Pricing
How it looks
Noto Serif for headlines, Noto Sans for text. 10 colours measured.
Worth borrowing
Us-vs-them comparison: Only 28% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. snappix.app does.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
6 of 11 selling tactics found: Us-vs-them comparison, Lead-capture form, Demo / docs entry, Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 5 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 5 it lacks
- Pricing tiers55% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. snappix.app doesn't. Gap
- Press / "as seen in"Only 25% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 18% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 17% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 6% of 1,575 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour and size
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Lead-capture form · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 6 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
Lead-capture form · the evidence
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Pricing tiers · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 10 on the first page
Prices seen · 4
Plus
Colours and type, in full.
Every colour and size we measured.
Colours · 10 measured, with their share
Type · Noto Serif, 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · snappix.app · Compare
← Back to the snappix.app reportCompare
Put your site next to snappix.app.
Every number, side by side.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.