This report was measured 47 days ago — past our freshness window.

userplay.io

Beats 12%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

userplay.io desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
Scanned 2026-09-15SaaS

What sets it apart

userplay.io does 1 thing few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 1,604 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Us-vs-them comparison

    Rarity

    Only 28%.

    of 1,604 SaaS funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.

    28 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 72 wait outside.

    452 of 1604 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    userplay.io Pricing capture, where it does this
    Where userplay.io does it · Pricing: “comparison grid: 54 rows”

    FOUND. Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. userplay.io does. 452 of 1604 SaaS funnels.

What it skips

userplay.io misses 2 things most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 12%.

of 1,608 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 12% of 1608 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Playtesting infrastructure for game studios”

  • Product
  • Platforms
  • What is Userplay?
  • Who is Userplay for?
  • What types of playtests does Userplay support?
  • How many playtests can I run with Userplay?
  • How does pricing work for Userplay?
  • How do we recruit players through Userplay?

How it’s built

12 UX checks · 4 pass · 4 need work · 3 notes · 1 not measured

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 65 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

2 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Note

Line length

19 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Heading levels

1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Show the other 6 checks
Note

Label in name

3 controls have an aria-label that does not contain its visible text, so voice-control users cannot activate it by saying what they see.

Needs work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

92% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Oversized images

130 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

165 of 232 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 3.2 MB across 74 measurable resources, but 138 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

How it looks

ui-sans-serif for headlines, ui-monospace for text. 7 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Us-vs-them comparison: Only 28% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. userplay.io does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

3 of 11 selling tactics found: Us-vs-them comparison, Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling. 8 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 8 it lacks
    • Free trial / freemium81% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. userplay.io doesn't. Gap
    • Pricing tiers54% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. userplay.io doesn't. Gap
    • Demo / docs entry36% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 23% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 18% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,604 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 3 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Free trial / freemium · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Lead-capture form · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Proof above the fold · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 12 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 5

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 7 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 11 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.27.0 on 2026-09-15, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 60 links on the entry page, 53 walkable. 3 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · userplay.io · Compare

← Back to the userplay.io report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to userplay.io?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

userplay.io

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.