adobealternatives.com
Beats 65%.
of 690 entry-page captures we’ve measured.


Something wrong?
Below the fold
Section by section.
Each part of the page, with our check beside it.

No crop
The crop for this section is not available yet.
Hero · their words: “ArtCraft Adobe Clones and Open-Source Creative Alternatives” Hero · 2% to 15% down the pageOur check
Not measuredNot measured for this section.
This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 2 buttons and links, “Explore the apps” and “What does “ArtCraft Adobe clones” mean?”, 61 words. Absent, not scored 0.

No crop
The crop for this section is not available yet.
Content · their words: “ArtCraft Adobe clones and related open-source tools” Content · 16% to 49% down the pageOur check
Not measuredNot measured for this section.
This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 6 buttons and links, “Explore PhotoCraft ↗” and “Explore VectorCraft ↗”, 342 words. Absent, not scored 0.

No crop
The crop for this section is not available yet.
Comparison · their words: “Compare the selected tools” Comparison · 49% to 63% down the pageOur check
Not measuredNot measured for this section.
This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 8 buttons and links, “Explore PhotoCraft ↗” and “Explore VectorCraft ↗”, a table, 143 words. Absent, not scored 0.

No crop
The crop for this section is not available yet.
FAQ · their words: “Questions about the selected tools” FAQ · 76% to 85% down the pageOur check
Not measuredNot measured for this section.
This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 32 words. Absent, not scored 0.
Sections of Homepage / Lander. Crops are portions of the page, shown beside our analysis. Measured by Roentgen 1.35.0 on 2026-11-02. A section with nothing detected is absent, never scored 0.
Something wrong?
What sets it apart
adobealternatives.com does 1 thing few peers do.
Each one is run by under 30% of 256 content funnels. Rarest first.
-
Us-vs-them comparison
Rarity
Only 2%.
of 256 content funnels have us-vs-them comparison. This site is one of them.
2 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 98 wait outside.
5 of 256 content funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip. 
Where adobealternatives.com does it · Homepage / Lander: “comparison table: Tool · Workflow · Platforms · Project status · Official app” FOUND. Only 2% of 256 content funnels do this. adobealternatives.com does. 5 of 256 content funnels.
Examples of this
Captures of this
Crops from this site 1

Comparison · Homepage / Lander
What it skips
Nothing most peers do is missing.
4 tactics adobealternatives.com could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 12% of 254 content funnels do this. · 30 of 254
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 4% of 169 content funnels do this. · 6 of 169
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 3% of 256 content funnels do this. · 8 of 256
Examples of this
- beadshub.netperler-bead-pattern-maker: Preview mode 2D 3D
- monalisaimg.comPreview 1024x1024 Featured Examples View All +35 more
- laya.toolsallow 9% send to review 20% ✓ remove 71%
- startupsubmit.app★★★★★ WEB Sparked LLC · U.S. registered company
- website-auditor.io1,396 websites audited
- everglad-contractor-quotes.ahmedsibghah.chatgpt.siteClient 2 Estimate 3 Review 4 Send
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 0% of 254 content funnels do this. · 1 of 254
Examples of this
Captures of this
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Peer rank
Beats 65%.
of 690 entry-page captures.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“ArtCraft Adobe Clones and Open-Source Creative Alternatives”
- Browse alternatives
- Explore the apps
How it’s built
22 UX checks · 16 pass · 2 need work · 2 notes · 2 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.65×.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Image alt text
All 39 content images carry alt text.
Named controls
Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.
Show the other 16 checks
Link text
No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Heading levels
No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (57 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Skip link
A same-page “skip to content” link was found.
Label in name
No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Render-blocking resources
1 stylesheet/script in <head> block first paint.
Landmark regions
The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.
Keyboard reachability
No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.
Line length
11 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Oversized images
1 image is shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 12px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Tap-target size (mobile)
15 of 64 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
Page weight
At least 0.0 MB across 3 measurable resources, but 40 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
Seen on the page
The sections of adobealternatives.com where each tactic we found shows up, cut from the capture.
Us-vs-them comparison1 crop

Comparison · Homepage / Lander
FAQ / objection handling1 crop

FAQ · Homepage / Lander
How it looks
Arial for headlines and text. 4 colours measured.
Worth borrowing
Us-vs-them comparison: Only 2% of 256 content funnels do this. adobealternatives.com does.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
3 of 7 selling tactics found: Us-vs-them comparison, FAQ / objection handling, Trusted-by logo wall. 4 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 4 it lacks
- Press / "as seen in"Only 12% of 254 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 4% of 169 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 3% of 256 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 0% of 254 content funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 3 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Us-vs-them comparison · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 2 on the first page
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 4 colours measured
Type scale · 12 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · adobealternatives.com · Compare
← Back to the adobealternatives.com reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to adobealternatives.com?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
adobealternatives.com
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.
Thanks — we review every report.
Your report on adobealternatives.com is in.
Staging: not stored