saas · Aug 9, 2026

startupsubmit.app

35/100 Sparse

Scores above 68% of 525 entry-page captures we have measured. Among the 289 saas funnels in that group, above 54%.

4/11 tactics
1 step
10 checks
3 flagged

Walk 26 links seen, 22 walkable, and 0 matched a funnel step. If this funnel continues past the entry page, we did not reach it — everything below is measured from the entry page alone.

How this was measured

Coverage is detection coverage, not a verdict — it counts the conversion tactics we could prove are present, out of the 11 that apply to a saas funnel.

Measured by Roentgen 1.20.1, one of our versioned rulesets. A capture is read once and its measurements freeze there, so the stamp says which ruleset read this one.

Captured Homepage / Lander — Step 1 · Homepage / Lander1 / 1

What we recorded

The funnel, frame by frame

1 step walked

see their whole funnel without clicking through it. scored step by step

measured

Homepage / Lander

5 tactics

$99 +10 more · 50% OFF · 1 proof point

FAQTrust badgesPressLogo wallUsage proof

In their own words

33 quoted

the entry page’s own title, headline, buttons and prices — quoted, never paraphrased

measured

Page title: Submit your Startup to 220+ Directories | StartupSubmit
Meta description: Manual directory submission service: We Submit your startup to 220+ trusted directories to boost SEO, backlinks, and AI visibility. From $99.
Headline: Get Listed in 220+ High-Authority Directories & Rank Higher on Google & ChatGPT
Section headings: High-Authority DirectoriesReal Client DR Results After Our Directories Submission ServiceWho Is StartupSubmit For?How We Boost Your SEO, Traffic & Domain Rating in 4 StepsDon't Let Your Launch Die.Own the First Page of Google for Your Startup.Real Founders. Real Results.From Invisible to Unignorable.+8 more, not shown
Buttons and links: Got a question? Chat, X or email — we reply fastStart Your SubmissionStart Referring Now
Prices on the page: $99$199$140$499$299$1.33$15$597+3 more, not shown

Sections

7 identified

structural bands identified on this funnel, cropped from its own capture

measured

Nav section of startupsubmit.app — **Nav**0% down the page

Hero section of startupsubmit.app — **Hero**1% down the page

Features section of startupsubmit.app — **Features**13% down the page

Logos section of startupsubmit.app — **Logos**24% down the page

Pricing section of startupsubmit.app — **Pricing**54% down the page

FAQ section of startupsubmit.app — **FAQ**77% down the page

Footer section of startupsubmit.app — **Footer**95% down the page

Elements

3 harvested

the atomic pieces — price anchors, ratings, guarantees — with their verbatim on-page text

measured

Price anchor element — **Price anchor**“$199”

Countdown element — **Countdown**“ENDS IN 06 d 17 h 26 m 49 s”

What we found

4 tactics

conversion tactics we could prove are present, with the on-page text that evidences each

measured

Trust & proof2 of 2

Shows customer logos or a trusted-by claim trusted by

Puts a number on adoption 1,600+ startups

Friction reduction1 of 2

Answers buyer objections What is a directory submission service?

Value reinforcement1 of 2

Puts a number on adoption 1,600+ startups

What we didn’t find

7 of 11 applicable

applicable tactics we checked for and did not see on any step we reached

measured

What we didn’t see7 of 11 applicable

Free trial / freemium 974 of 1248 measured funnels run this

Pricing tiers 636 of 1248 measured funnels run this

Demo / docs entry 440 of 1256 measured funnels run this

Lead-capture form 310 of 1256 measured funnels run this

Us-vs-them comparison 304 of 1777 measured funnels run this

Proof above the fold 292 of 1777 measured funnels run this

Scarcity / urgency copy 94 of 1769 measured funnels run this

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How well it’s built

10 run · 3 flagged

contrast, mobile, typography, accessibility, weight — each with what would fix it

measured

Readability & contrast1 flagged

Text contrast (WCAG AA) needs workcontrast:text-contrast-wcag-aa

84% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.

worst: “10k” at 2.46:1 (10px, #94a3b8 on #fafafa). needs 4.5:1

fix Raise text/background contrast to ≥4.5:1 (≥3:1 for large text), especially on CTAs and body copy.

Mobile & tap targetsclear

Mobile viewport passesmobile:mobile-viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Typography1 flagged

Body text size needs worktype:body-text-size

Smallest body text is 9px (base ~12px). below the ~16px readable floor.

fix Keep body copy ≥15-16px; reserve sub-13px for fine print only.

Line length notetype:line-length

19 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

fix Cap measure at ~60-75ch for comfortable reading.

Accessibility hygieneclear

Weight & delivery1 flagged

Page weight not measurableweight:page-weight

At least 0.2 MB across 12 measurable resources, but 55 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Render-blocking resources noteweight:render-blocking-resources

5 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

fix Defer non-critical JS (defer/async) and inline only critical CSS.

Oversized images needs workweight:oversized-images

22 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

“YZJqLn39_400x400.jpg” is 400px wide, displayed at 40px

fix Serve responsive sizes (srcset/sizes) matching the rendered width.