amazon.nl

Beats 4%.

of 1,663 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

amazon.nl mobile capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2

Something wrong?

Scanned 2026-11-01SaaS

Below the fold

Section by section.

Each part of the page, with our check beside it.

  1. No crop

    This section is only 4% of the page, too thin to show without cutting in the one next to it.

    Content · 3% to 7% down the page

    Our check

    Not measured

    Not measured for this section.

    This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 1 button or link, “Follow”, a form, 1 word. Absent, not scored 0.

Sections of Homepage / Lander. Crops are portions of the page, shown beside our analysis. Measured by Roentgen 1.35.0 on 2026-11-01. A section with nothing detected is absent, never scored 0.

Something wrong?

What sets it apart

amazon.nl does 1 thing few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 1,657 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Lead-capture form

    Rarity

    Only 29%.

    of 1,657 SaaS funnels have lead-capture form. This site is one of them.

    29 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 71 wait outside.

    475 of 1657 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    amazon.nl Ax capture, where it does this
    Where amazon.nl does it · Ax: “email, submit”

    FOUND. Only 29% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. amazon.nl does. 475 of 1657 SaaS funnels.

What it skips

amazon.nl misses 3 things most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 4%.

of 1,663 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 4% of 1663 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Amazon.nl: Native”

  • Open
  • Go
  • Follow
  • Share
  • TOP OF PAGE
  • Netherlands
  • Download the Amazon App
  • Your Subscribe & Save Items

How it’s built

26 UX checks · 12 pass · 8 need work · 3 notes · 3 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line length

No sampled paragraph runs past ~95 characters per line.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 14 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Form labels

All 2 form fields carry a label.

Show the other 20 checks
Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (17 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Oversized images

No image is shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Pass

Autocomplete hints

3 of 6 fields carry an autocomplete attribute.

Note

Heading levels

1 heading skips a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Keyboard reachability

1 element looks clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

39 of 57 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Line height

Body line-height is 1.25×, tight enough to hurt readability.

Needs work

Named controls

2 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Needs work

Horizontal overflow

The page scrolls ~610px horizontally at 390px wide. content spills past the viewport.

Needs work

Render-blocking resources

16 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Needs work

Landmark regions

No <main> or <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Needs work

Input types

1 field uses type="text" for email or phone. mobile keyboards will not adapt.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 3.0 MB across 136 measurable resources, but 36 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

Not checked

Inline validation

No validation attributes were found in the DOM. Script-driven validation is invisible to this check, so absence is not a failure.

How it looks

Arial for headlines and text. 8 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Lead-capture form: Only 29% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. amazon.nl does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

2 of 11 selling tactics found: Lead-capture form, Trusted-by logo wall. 9 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 9 it lacks
    • Free trial / freemium81% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. amazon.nl doesn't. Gap
    • FAQ / objection handling80% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. amazon.nl doesn't. Gap
    • Pricing tiers52% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. amazon.nl doesn't. Gap
    • Demo / docs entry36% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 29% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 21% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 19% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Lead-capture form · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 2 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Lead-capture form · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Free trial / freemium · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 8 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 8 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 5 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.35.0 on 2026-11-01, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 56 links on the entry page, 44 walkable. 1 matched a funnel step; we captured 2 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · amazon.nl · Compare

← Back to the amazon.nl report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to amazon.nl?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

amazon.nl

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.