angrydancefilter.com
Beats 43%.
of 692 entry-page captures we’ve measured.
What it skips
Nothing most peers do is missing.
5 tactics angrydancefilter.com could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 12% of 254 content funnels do this. · 30 of 254
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 4% of 167 content funnels do this. · 6 of 167
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 3% of 256 content funnels do this. · 8 of 256
Examples of this
- beadshub.netperler-bead-pattern-maker: Preview mode 2D 3D
- monalisaimg.comPreview 1024x1024 Featured Examples View All +35 more
- laya.toolsallow 9% send to review 20% ✓ remove 71%
- startupsubmit.app★★★★★ WEB Sparked LLC · U.S. registered company
- website-auditor.io1,396 websites audited
- everglad-contractor-quotes.ahmedsibghah.chatgpt.siteClient 2 Estimate 3 Review 4 Send
Us-vs-them comparisonOpportunityOnly 2% of 256 content funnels do this. · 4 of 256
Examples of this
Captures of this
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 0% of 254 content funnels do this. · 1 of 254
Examples of this
Captures of this
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Peer rank
Beats 43%.
of 692 entry-page captures.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“ANGRY DANCE FILTER: ONE PHOTO, ONE ANGRY DANCE VIDEO”
- Visit the generator
- Choose photo
- Coming soon
How it’s built
21 UX checks · 14 pass · 2 need work · 3 notes · 2 not measured
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
100% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.6×.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Link text
No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.
Heading structure
The landing page has exactly one <h1>.
Show the other 15 checks
Heading levels
No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (61 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Skip link
A same-page “skip to content” link was found.
Label in name
No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Render-blocking resources
1 stylesheet/script in <head> block first paint.
Landmark regions
The page has header, main and footer landmark regions.
Keyboard reachability
No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.
Line length
24 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Image alt text
1 of 32 content images (3%) have no alt attribute.
Oversized images
1 image is shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 12px, below the 13px floor this check uses.
Named controls
1 button/link has no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Page weight
At least 4.4 MB across 30 measurable resources, but 33 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
How it looks
Anton for headlines, JetBrains Mono Variable for text. 4 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
2 of 7 selling tactics found: FAQ / objection handling, Trusted-by logo wall. 5 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 5 it lacks
- Press / "as seen in"Only 12% of 254 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 4% of 167 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 3% of 256 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 2% of 256 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 0% of 254 content funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 2 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 3 on the first page
Prices seen · 3
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 4 colours measured
Type scale · 10 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · angrydancefilter.com · Compare
← Back to the angrydancefilter.com reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to angrydancefilter.com?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
angrydancefilter.com
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.