cohire.com

Beats 4%.

of 1,663 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.

cohire.com desktop capture of the first page
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Something wrong?

Scanned 2026-11-03SaaS

What sets it apart

cohire.com does 1 thing few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 1,657 SaaS funnels. Rarest first.

  1. Lead-capture form

    Rarity

    Only 29%.

    of 1,657 SaaS funnels have lead-capture form. This site is one of them.

    29 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 71 wait outside.

    475 of 1657 SaaS funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.
    cohire.com Sign Up capture, where it does this
    Where cohire.com does it · Sign Up: “FirstName, LastName, TitleOrDesignation, Email”

    FOUND. Only 29% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. cohire.com does. 475 of 1657 SaaS funnels.

What it skips

cohire.com misses 3 things most peers do.

Most common first. The rare ones are opportunities, not gaps. Open a row to see who does.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.

Peer rank

Beats 4%.

of 1,663 multi-step SaaS funnels.

beats 4% of 1663 multi-step SaaS funnels. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“CoHire.com - Jobs, Talent Search, Recruitment Platform, Business Listing”

  • About
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
  • FEED
  • PEOPLE
  • TRENDING
  • What do you want to post?
  • VIEW MORE

How it’s built

26 UX checks · 10 pass · 9 need work · 6 notes · 1 not measured

Pass

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

96% of measurable text passes WCAG AA.

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.5×.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (72 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Show the other 20 checks
Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Input types

No email or phone field uses type="text".

Pass

Autocomplete hints

6 of 7 fields carry an autocomplete attribute.

Pass

Inline validation

7 fields carry validation attributes (required/pattern/aria-invalid).

Note

Line length

8 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Form labels

12 form fields rely on placeholder text as the only label.

Note

Heading structure

The landing page has no <h1>.

Note

Heading levels

4 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Keyboard reachability

49 elements look clickable but cannot be reached by keyboard.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 10px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Image alt text

15 of 57 content images (26%) have no alt attribute.

Needs work

Named controls

30 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).

Needs work

Horizontal overflow

The page scrolls ~12px horizontally at 1440px wide. content spills past the viewport.

Needs work

Page weight

At least 5.0 MB across 145 measurable resources. 274 cross-origin resources did not expose a size, so the real total is higher.

Needs work

Render-blocking resources

87 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Needs work

Oversized images

38 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Landmark regions

No <main> or <header> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

430 of 535 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

How it looks

Poppins for headlines and text. 8 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Lead-capture form: Only 29% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. cohire.com does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

2 of 11 selling tactics found: Lead-capture form, FAQ / objection handling. 9 not found.

Free · you see

  • Which tactics it uses
  • Which 9 it lacks
    • Free trial / freemium81% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. cohire.com doesn't. Gap
    • Trusted-by logo wall79% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. cohire.com doesn't. Gap
    • Pricing tiers52% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. cohire.com doesn't. Gap
    • Demo / docs entry36% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 29% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Press / "as seen in"Only 21% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Proof above the foldOnly 19% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
    • Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,657 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity

    Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

  • Every UX check

Plus · $29/mo

  • The proof behind each tactic
  • Who has what it lacks
  • Every word, colour share and type scale

Lead-capture form · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Put your site next to this one.

Plus

Proof for all 2 tactics.

The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.

Lead-capture form · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

FAQ / objection handling · the evidence

Plus · $29/mo

Their main button, as captured

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Who has what it lacks.

For each gap, the peers that have it.

Free trial / freemium · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Trusted-by logo wall · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Pricing tiers · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Demo / docs entry · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Us-vs-them comparison · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Press / "as seen in" · who has it

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Every word they use.

Buttons, links and prices, in full.

Buttons and links · 10 on the first page

Plus · $29/mo

Prices seen · 8

Plus · $29/mo

Plus

Colour share and type scale.

How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.

Colour share · 8 colours measured

Plus · $29/mo

Type scale · 10 sizes

Plus · $29/mo

UXXRAY+

Open every locked row.

$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.

Every figure on this page was read off the live site by Roentgen 1.35.0 on 2026-11-03, a script that reads page structure, computed CSS and matched text. No AI judgment, nothing estimated, and a capture’s numbers stay as read.

How this was measured

Detection coverage, not a verdict. A low count means we did not detect those checks, not that the funnel is weak.

Walk 182 links on the entry page, 163 walkable. 3 matched a funnel step; we captured 4 pages in all, this one included.

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

Read the method · JSON bundle · Markdown brief · Design tokens · llms.txt

Site report · cohire.com · Compare

← Back to the cohire.com report

Compare · step 1 of 2

Who goes next to cohire.com?

Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.

This site

cohire.com

The other site

Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.

On this page

Section by section.

The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.