setme.net
Beats 50%.
of 1,661 multi-step SaaS funnels we’ve measured.
Below the fold
Section by section.
Each part of the page, with our check beside it.
No crop
The crop for this section is not available yet.
Hero · their words: “Remote access without boundaries” Hero · 1% to 9% down the pageOur check
Not measuredNot measured for this section.
This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 1 button or link, “Start free trial”, 17 words. Absent, not scored 0.
No crop
The crop for this section is not available yet.
Content · their words: “Unlimited unattended devices” Content · 8% to 15% down the pageOur check
Not measuredNot measured for this section.
This capture has no element locations, so no check is placed here. Measured: 67 words. Absent, not scored 0.
Sections of Homepage / Lander. Crops are portions of the page, shown beside our analysis. Measured by Roentgen 1.35.0 on 2026-11-03. A section with nothing detected is absent, never scored 0.
Something wrong?
What it skips
Nothing most peers do is missing.
6 tactics setme.net could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.
Lead-capture formOpportunityOnly 29% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. · 475 of 1655
Examples of this
Us-vs-them comparisonOpportunityOnly 29% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. · 472 of 1655
Press / "as seen in"OpportunityOnly 21% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. · 353 of 1655
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 19% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. · 310 of 1655
Examples of this
Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 16% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. · 268 of 1655
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 5% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. · 89 of 1655
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
How it ranks
Where it ranks.
Against its own peers: the same funnel type and walk depth.
Peer rank
Beats 50%.
of 1,661 multi-step SaaS funnels.
What we found
What we found.
Free to read.
What they say
“Remote access without boundaries”
- Sign in
- Free Trial
- Start free trial
How it’s built
25 UX checks · 9 pass · 7 need work · 6 notes · 3 not measured
Mobile viewport
Responsive viewport meta is present.
Body text size
Smallest sampled text is 15px; first paragraph 16px.
Line height
Body line-height is 1.8×.
Language declared
html[lang] is set for screen readers.
Page title
The landing page has a <title> (44 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.
Label in name
No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.
Show the other 19 checks
Horizontal overflow
The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.
Keyboard reachability
No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.
Input types
No email or phone field uses type="text".
Line length
128 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.
Link text
3 links use generic text (“click here” / “learn more”).
Heading structure
The landing page has 11 <h1> elements (expected 1).
Heading levels
8 headings skip a level (e.g. <h2> followed by <h4>). Screen-reader users navigate by this outline.
Skip link
No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.
Autocomplete hints
No autocomplete attributes across 4 fields. browsers cannot autofill.
Text contrast (WCAG AA)
91% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail.
Image alt text
97 of 146 content images (66%) have no alt attribute.
Named controls
37 buttons/links have no accessible name (icon-only, no aria-label).
Render-blocking resources
13 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.
Oversized images
288 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.
Landmark regions
No <main> or <header> or <footer> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.
Tap-target size (mobile)
135 of 156 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.
Page weight
At least 2.0 MB across 88 measurable resources, but 150 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.
Largest paint element
The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.
Inline validation
No validation attributes were found in the DOM. Script-driven validation is invisible to this check, so absence is not a failure.
How it looks
Open Sans for headlines and text. 8 colours measured.
How it sells
Free names. Plus proves.
5 of 11 selling tactics found: Demo / docs entry, Pricing tiers, Trusted-by logo wall, FAQ / objection handling, Free trial / freemium. 6 not found.
Free · you see
- Which tactics it uses
Which 6 it lacks
- Lead-capture formOnly 29% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 29% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Press / "as seen in"Only 21% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 19% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 16% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 5% of 1,655 SaaS funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
- Every UX check
Plus · $29/mo
- The proof behind each tactic
- Who has what it lacks
- Every word, colour share and type scale
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
Sites like this.
Same funnel type, most checks found first.
Put your site next to this one.
Plus
Proof for all 5 tactics.
The exact evidence for each one we found. Open a row to read it.
Demo / docs entry · the evidence
Pricing tiers · the evidence
Trusted-by logo wall · the evidence
FAQ / objection handling · the evidence
Free trial / freemium · the evidence
Their main button, as captured
Plus
Who has what it lacks.
For each gap, the peers that have it.
Lead-capture form · who has it
Us-vs-them comparison · who has it
Press / "as seen in" · who has it
Proof above the fold · who has it
Usage / adoption proof · who has it
Scarcity / urgency copy · who has it
Plus
Every word they use.
Buttons, links and prices, in full.
Buttons and links · 3 on the first page
Prices seen · 8
Plus
Colour share and type scale.
How much of the page each colour covers, and every size in the scale.
Colour share · 8 colours measured
Type scale · 9 sizes
UXXRAY+
Open every locked row.
$29/mo. Every row above, with the evidence behind it.
Site report · setme.net · Compare
← Back to the setme.net reportCompare · step 1 of 2
Who goes next to setme.net?
Pick any site we have measured, or x-ray a new one. Both sit side by side at the end.
This site
setme.net
The other site
Comparing your own site? Type it above. If we have not measured it, we x-ray it live.
On this page
Section by section.
The bands the crawler found on this page, top to bottom. Pick one.
Thanks — we review every report.
Your report on setme.net is in.
Staging: not stored