Owner view · mention.page

mention.page

Beats 66%.

You beat 66%.

of 696 entry-page captures we’ve measured.

Compare with another site

Get Plus · $29/mo Compare with another site →

Something wrong?

Scanned 2026-11-04Content

Below the fold

Section by section.

Each part of the page, with our check beside it.

Hero · their words: “Get your startup featured on 500+ media outlets in 72 hours, guaranteed.”
Hero · 0% to 13% down the page
Our check
Not detected
Nothing detected in this section.
No tactic located here. Measured: 7 buttons and links, “mention” and “by Tiny Startups”, 134 words. Absent, not scored 0.
Content · their words: “Get your launch in the news. Get found everywhere after.”
Content · 14% to 45% down the page
Our check
Not detected
Nothing detected in this section.
No tactic located here. Measured: 6 buttons and links, “See packages” and “See examples”, 379 words. Absent, not scored 0.

Sections of Homepage / Lander. Crops are portions of the page, shown beside our analysis. Measured by Roentgen 1.35.1 on 2026-11-04. A section with nothing detected is absent, never scored 0.

Something wrong?

What sets it apart

mention.page does 1 thing few peers do.

Each one is run by under 30% of 258 content funnels. Rarest first.

Press / "as seen in"

Rarity
Only 12%.
of 258 content funnels have press / "as seen in". This site is one of them.
12 of 100 are inside the rope. The other 88 wait outside.
30 of 258 content funnels evaluated. 1 pip = 1%, drawn to the nearest pip.

Where mention.page does it · Homepage / Lander: “as seen on”

FOUND. Only 12% of 258 content funnels do this. mention.page does. 30 of 258 content funnels.
Examples of this
Captures of this

What it skips

Nothing most peers do is missing.

4 tactics mention.page could still add. Most peers skip them too, so each one would stand out.

Usage / adoption proofOpportunityOnly 3% of 174 content funnels do this. · 6 of 174
Examples of this
Captures of this
Proof above the foldOpportunityOnly 3% of 260 content funnels do this. · 8 of 260
Examples of this
Captures of this
Us-vs-them comparisonOpportunityOnly 2% of 260 content funnels do this. · 5 of 260
Examples of this
Captures of this
Scarcity / urgency copyOpportunityOnly 0% of 258 content funnels do this. · 1 of 258
Examples of this
- supawazap.com
Captures of this
- supawazap.com

Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.

How it ranks

Where it ranks.

Peer rank

Beats 66%.

of 696 entry-page captures.

beats 66% of 696 entry-page captures. 1 column = 5% of the cohort, drawn to the nearest column.

What we found

What we found.

Free to read.

What they say

“Get your startup featured on 500+ media outlets in 72 hours, guaranteed.”

Get featured now
Get Professional
Get Global Media
Sound on

How it’s built

22 UX checks · 13 pass · 4 need work · 3 notes · 2 not measured

Pass

Mobile viewport

Responsive viewport meta is present.

Pass

Line height

Body line-height is 1.5×.

Pass

Language declared

html[lang] is set for screen readers.

Pass

Image alt text

All 28 content images carry alt text.

Pass

Named controls

Every sampled button and link has an accessible name.

Pass

Link text

No sampled link uses generic text such as “click here” or “learn more”.

Show the other 16 checks

Pass

Heading structure

The landing page has exactly one <h1>.

Pass

Heading levels

No heading skips a level (no <h2> followed directly by an <h4>).

Pass

Page title

The landing page has a <title> (42 characters). Whether it is descriptive is not judged.

Pass

Label in name

No sampled control has an aria-label that omits its visible text.

Pass

Horizontal overflow

The page does not scroll horizontally at 1440px wide.

Pass

Render-blocking resources

2 stylesheets/scripts in <head> block first paint.

Pass

Keyboard reachability

No element that looks clickable was found that keyboard users cannot reach.

Note

Line length

5 paragraphs run past ~95 characters per line.

Note

Skip link

No same-page “skip to content” link was found. Keyboard users tab through the whole nav on every page.

Note

Landmark regions

No <main> landmark. screen-reader users cannot jump between regions.

Needs work

Text contrast (WCAG AA)

78% of measurable text passes WCAG AA. 4+ runs fail. 18% of text was unmeasurable (over images/gradients). not counted either way.

Needs work

Body text size

Smallest sampled text is 11px, below the 13px floor this check uses.

Needs work

Oversized images

58 images are shipped at more than 2x the width shown.

Needs work

Tap-target size (mobile)

19 of 31 interactive targets are under 44×44px on mobile.

Not checked

Page weight

At least 0.2 MB across 25 measurable resources, but 9 cross-origin resources did not expose a size. The true weight cannot be determined from the page.

Not checked

Largest paint element

The browser did not report a largest painted element for this capture.

How it looks

Plus Jakarta Sans for headlines, Figtree for text. 10 colours measured.

Worth borrowing

Press / "as seen in": Only 12% of 258 content funnels do this. mention.page does.

How it sells

Free names. Plus proves.

3 of 7 selling tactics found: Press / "as seen in", FAQ / objection handling, Trusted-by logo wall. 4 not found.

Get Plus · $29/mo

Free · you see

Which tactics it uses
Which 4 it lacks
- Usage / adoption proofOnly 3% of 174 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Proof above the foldOnly 3% of 260 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Us-vs-them comparisonOnly 2% of 260 content funnels do this. Opportunity
- Scarcity / urgency copyOnly 0% of 258 content funnels do this. Opportunity
Absence is a measurement, not a recommendation: we do not know why a tactic is missing, whether it belongs here, or whether adding it would change anything. Where a walk stopped early, a tactic living deeper would also read as not detected.
Every UX check